State v. Erik B. Hudson, 2010AP000780-CR, District 3, 8/10/10

court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Hudson: George S.Pappas, Jr.; BiC; Resp.

While “better practice” would have been to strike and give a curative instruction following a witness’s non-responsive testimony, the trial court’s failure to do so wasn’t plain error.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *