Explore in-depth analysis
On Point is a judicial analysis blog written by members of the Wisconsin State Public Defenders. It includes cases from the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Supreme Court of Wisconsin, and the Supreme Court of the United States.
Seventh Circuit Update Part 1: Cases from July
It’s September, so that leaves us asking the usual question: What happened to the summer? It turns out that July and August were busy months for the Seventh, so we’ll be updating readers in two installments. We will also be posting separately on the big defense win with respect to AI child porn. This installment features discussion of whether those previously involuntarily committed can possess guns, the contractual interpretation of plea bargains, and a smattering of Fourth Amendment cases.
COA holds that termination of parental rights automatically terminates the parent’s obligation to pay child support, and the parent is entitled to be reimbursed for overpayments.
Rhiannon M. Stroede v. Jason R. Royal, 2025AP2654, 9/3/26, District IV (not recommended for publication); case activity
The COA held that an order terminating a parent’s rights to a child automatically terminates the parent’s obligation to pay child support and the parent is entitled to be reimbursed for any overpayments.
COA determines misbehavior at mental health facility sufficient to deny conditional release from NGI commitment, although defendant no longer suffers from mental illness and has no recent history of violence.
State v. Deonte D. Anderson, 2025AP1309 & 2025AP1310, 9/2/26, District II (not recommended for publication); case activity
The COA affirmed the circuit court’s order denying the defendant’s petition for conditional release from a commitment entered after he was found not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect. Although the defendant no longer suffered from a mental illness and had not engaged in violence for four years, his poor behavioral record at the Mendota Mental Health Institute was sufficient evidence to deny the petition.
COA: Sentencing court may set eligibility date for extended supervision based on victim’s life expectancy if relevant to a primary sentencing factor.
State v. Antwon C. Powell, 2024AP2551, 8/25/26, District III (not recommended for publication); case activity
The COA held that a circuit court may rely on a victim’s life expectancy to set an eligibility date for extended supervision, provided life expectancy is relevant to the primary sentencing factors.
COA rejects challenge to exercise of discretion at TPR disposition hearing
State v. Y.M., 2026AP1212, 8/27/26, District I (ineligible for publication); case activity
“Yolanda” challenges the circuit court’s exercise of discretion at disposition, arguing that the evidence lacked “complete and meaningful testimony” from the children’s foster placements and potential adoptive parents. COA rejects these arguments and affirms.
COA affirms denial of motion to suppress extension of stop and PBT results
State v. Paula Andrea Champion, 2025AP802, 8/18/26, District I (ineligible for publication); case activity
COA affirms circuit court’s denial of Paula Champion’s motion to suppress in appeal of PAC 1st judgment.
COA clarifies ability of circuit court to enter default order for nonappearance in civil OWI matter
Lincoln County v. Kayla J. Ristau, 2024AP404, 8/25/26, District III (ineligible for publication); case activity
In a case interpreting a common scenario for some practitioners handling first offense OWIs, COA clarifies the ability of the circuit court to hold a defendant in default for nonappearance and reverses this default order.
SCOW accepts case calling into question Gramza holding
State v. Angela R. Joski, 2023AP001371-CR, petition for review of a published decision of the court of appeals, granted 8/18/25; case activity
In a case that could call for an abrupt reassessment of very recent COA precedent, SCOW has indicated its willingness to assess the ability of persons convicted of certain OWI offenses to obtain early release.
COA relies on evidence from initial protective placement hearing to conclude current placement least restrictive where there is no evidence condition had changed and some evidence condition had deteriorated.
Door County v. R.A.W., 2026AP83, 8/18/26, District III (ineligible for publication); case activity
The COA affirmed the appellant’s protective placement in a 24-hour community based residential facility because evidence from the initial hearing and hearing to continue protective placement was sufficient to show that the current placement was the least restrictive in light of the appellant’s need for medication management and 24-hour supervision.
COA rejects circuit court’s factual findings in speeding appeal
State v. Jeremy Kris Pool, 2025AP1228, 8/20/26, District IV (ineligible for publication); case activity
In a rare case where COA opts to critique and then ultimately reject the factual findings of the circuit court, COA concludes the lower court erred in determining Pool’s speed. It rejects his argument that the citation was improperly amended during the trial.
On Point is sponsored by Wisconsin State Public Defenders. All content is subject to public disclosure. Comments are moderated. If you have questions about this blog, please email [email protected].
On Point provides information (not legal advice) about important developments in the law. Please note that this information may not be up to date. Viewing this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with the Wisconsin State Public Defender. Readers should consult an attorney for their legal needs.