On Point blog, page 4 of 4
TPR – Mootness
Kenosha County DHS v. Amber D., 2011AP667, District 2, 9/7/11
court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Amber D.: Philip J, Brehm; case activity
Mother’s termination appeal, explicitly linking itself to outcome of father’s then-pending appeal, rendered moot by latter’s unsuccessful outcome:
¶1 Amber D. appeals from an order terminating her parental rights. At the time that she wrote her brief, the father’s appeal was pending.
TPR – §§ 48.422(8) & 48.422(9)(a)
State v. Lakesha M., 2011AP1280, District 1, 9/7/11
court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Lakesha M.: Carl W. Chessir; case activity
Termination of parental rights affirmed, court rejecting argument that procedural requirements of §§ 48.422(8) & 48.422(9)(a) (where petition not brought by agency, court “shall” order parent to provide certain information) violated:
¶5 The Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare did not file the petitions here.