On Point blog, page 5 of 5
Federal Freedom of Information Act Doesn’t Apply to Corporations
FCC v. AT&T, USSC No. 09-1279, 3/1/11
The “personal privacy” exemption in the federal Freedom of Information Act doesn’t apply to corporations, though they are considered “persons” under the Act.
… Adjectives typically reflect the meaning of corresponding nouns, but not always. Sometimes they acquire distinct meanings of their own. The noun “crab” refers variously to a crustacean and a type of apple, while the related adjective “crabbed” can refer to handwriting that is “difficult to read,” Webster’s Third New International Dictionary 527 (2002);
State v. Eric A., 2010AP1161, District 3, 3/1/11
court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Eric A.: pro se; case activity
Expungement – Delinquency Adjudication, § 938.355(4m)(a)
Denial of petition for expungement of repeated sexual assault of child adjudication is affirmed.
¶8 Here, the court determined that the offense was too serious, and it would be against public policy, to permit expungement. The court’s order stated society would be harmed by granting expungement.
Preservation of Issue: Motion in Limine; Ineffective Assistance: Client’s Failure to Reveal Information to Counsel; Harmless Error Review: Cf. IAC-Prejudice; Evidence: § 905.05 Marital Privilege & 3rd-Party
State v. Winston B. Eison, 2011 WI App 52; for Eison: Andrea Taylor Cornwall, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate; case activity
Preservation of Issue – Motion in Limine
Eison objected to introduction of evidence of his arrest on an unrelated offense via motion in limine, which the trial court granted. At trial, however, the court allowed the State to introduce this evidence. Eison didn’t need to lodge additional objection to preserve the issue for review.