On Point blog, page 93 of 120
Appellate Procedure – Standard of Review – Sentencing (pre-2010 Caselaw)
Go: here.
Appellate Procedure – Standard of Review – Speedy Trial (pre-2010 Caselaw)
Go: here.
S.C. Johnson v. Milton E. Morris, 2010 WI App 6, PFR filed
Inadequate Appendix to Appellate Brief
¶5 n. 1:
We note that neither Russell’s nor Buske’s appellate counsel properly cite to the record. Record cites are often missing. An appellate court is improperly burdened where briefs fail to consistently and accurately cite to the record. Meyer v. Fronimades, 2 Wis. 2d 89, 93-94, 86 N.W.2d 25 (1957). Even more troubling is that both appellate counsel failed to include in the appendix all “the findings or opinion[s] of the circuit court … including oral or written rulings or decisions showing the circuit court’s reasoning regarding those issues,” as required by Wis.
Michelle Williams v. Housing Authority of the City of Milwaukee, 2010 WI App 14
Appellate Standard of Review, Certiorari
¶9 When we review an application for a writ of certiorari, we review the agency’s decision, not the decision of the circuit court. Kraus v. City of Waukesha Police & Fire Comm’n, 2003 WI 51, ¶10, 261 Wis. 2d 485, 662 N.W.2d 294. The scope of certiorari review is limited to whether the Housing Authority: (1) kept within its jurisdiction;
Lolita Black v. City of Kenosha Housing Authority, 2009AP2368, Dist II, 12/30/09
Civil Notice of Appeal and Finality of Order
All final judgments or final orders entered after September 1, 2007, must include a statement that it is a final judgment or final order for purposes of appeal, but it is not “an absolute rule” that “an appeal cannot be filed from a judgment or order that disposes of the entire matter in litigation but does not include the statement that it is final for purposes of appeal,” ¶3.
State v. Dione Wendell Haywood, 2009 WI App 178
court of appeals decision; for Haywood: Robert E. Haney
Battery to Peace Officer, § 940.20(2), Elements
It is no defense to battery-to-officer that the officer refused to leave the premises when the resident withdrew consent to enter, because acting “lawfully” is not an element of the offense: “a law-enforcement officer need not be acting ‘lawfully’ for what he or she does to be done in the officer’s ‘official capacity.’
Waukesha County v. Genevieve M., 2009 WI App 173
court of appeals decision; for Genevieve M.: Lora B. Cerone, SPD, Madison Appellate
Notice of Appeal Contents: Failure to Identify Appealable Document; Notice of Intent as Substitute
¶2 n. 2:
The failure of the notice of appeal to correctly identify the final appealable document is not fatal to appellate jurisdiction. See Carrington v. St. Paul Fire &