On Point blog, page 294 of 484
Sexual Assault; Charging Document; Excited Utterances; Newly Discovered Evidence
State v. Dion M. Echols, 2010AP2626-CR, District 1, 9/27/11
court of appeals decision (not recommended for publication); for Echols: Amelia L. Bizzaro; case activity
Evidence held sufficient to establish “great bodily harm” element of 1st-degree sexual assault, § 940.225(1)(a), where the harm was inflicted a short time after the assault.
¶23 In this case, the trial court properly determined that Echols’ shooting M.F. subsequent to the nonconsensual sexual contact constituted great bodily harm.
Mental Commitment – Probable Cause Time Limit – Lost Competency to Proceed
Outagamie County v. Paul S., 2011AP920, District 3, 9/27/11
court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Paul S.: Shelley Fite, SPD, Madison Appellate; case activity
¶9 Wisconsin Stat. § 51.15(5) provides an individual may “not be detained by the law enforcement officer or other person and the facility for more than a total of 72 hours, exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays” without a hearing.
Terry Stop, Compared with Arrest
State v. Daniel R. Doyle, 2010AP2466-CR, District 4, 9/22/11
court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Doyle: John C. Orth; case activity
Transport of drunk driving suspect 3-4 miles to local police station for purpose of administering field sobriety tests didn’t covert Terry stop into arrest, given that extreme, adverse weather conditions rendered impractical such testing at the scene.
¶11 Terry is codified in Wis.
Search Warrant – Probable Cause – Anonymous Informant
State v. Anastasia A. Lusty, 2010AP2827-CR, District 2, 9/21/11
court of appeals decision (not recommended for publication); for Lusty: Chandra N. Harvey, SPD, Madison Appellate; case activity
Independent police investigation sufficiently corroborated enough details of tips from anonymous informants to support probable cause for a search warrant.
¶9 We reject Lusty’s argument. Based on our reading of the record, we are more than satisfied that the facts before the magistrate,
Sentencing – Discretion – Review
State v. Jason D. Spears, 2011AP934-CR, District 1, 9/20/11
court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Spears: Kyle S. Conway; case activity
Trial court’s failure to explain rationale for sentence violated State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶¶44-49, 270 Wis. 2d 535, 678 N.W.2d 197, and requires remand for resentencing.
¶11 Here, the circuit court did not explain how Spears’s criminal history impacted its sentencing decision,
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel – Lesser Offense; Sentencing – Exercise of Discretion
State v. Aaron Deal, 2010AP1804-CR, District 1, 9/20/11
court of appeals decision (not recommended for publication); for Deal: James A. Rebholz; case activity
Counsel’s refusal to argue to the jury that it should return a guilty verdict on felony murder, submitted as a lesser offense option of first-degree intentional homicide, wasn’t deficient in light of the defendant’s insistence on an all-or-nothing strategy.
¶8 At the Machner hearing,
Involuntary Statement – Harmless Error
State v. Dennis D. Lemoine, 2010AP2597-CR, District 4, 9/15/11
court of appeals decision (not recommended for publication); for Lemoine: Donna L. Hintze, Katie R. York, SPD, Madison Appellate; case activity; supreme court review granted, 1/25/12
¶18 We agree with the trial court that the balance of the defendant’s personal characteristics against the tactics used by the police renders this is a “close case.” However,
Hearing-Impaired Juror: Inability to Hear Certain Testimony; Evidence: Haseltine “Vouching” Testimony – Harmless Error
State v. James T. Kettner, 2011 WI App 142 (recommended for publication); for Kettner: Andrew R. Hinkel, Jefren E. Olsen, SPD, Madison Appellate; case activity
Hearing-Impaired Juror – Inability to Hear Certain Testimony
A juror’s inability to hear most of alleged victim S.K.’s answers in a videotaped interview didn’t violate Kettner’s rights to impartial jury or due process, given that S.K. also testified in person consistent with her videotaped answers.
Search & Seizure – Community Caretaker; Attenuation Doctrine – Witness Statements
State v. Ricky O. Halverson, 2011AP240-CR, District 2, 9/14/11
court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Halverson: Walter R. Andrew; case activity
Officer, whose investigation of single-car crash led him to Halverson’s home, wasn’t properly engaged in community caretaker exercise when he took Halverson into custody, supposedly for his own good, ¶¶8-14. Community caretaker test, State v. Kramer, 2009 WI 14,
Traffic Stop – Probable Cause – 911 Call
City of Sheboygan Falls v. John D. Prinsen, 2011AP700, District 2, 9/14/11
court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Prinsen: Kirk B. Obear, Casey J. Hoff; case activity
Probable cause supported stop for driving wrong way on highway, based on information provided ion a 911 call; State v. Rutzinski, 2001 WI 22, 241 Wis. 2d 729, 623 N.W.2d 516, applied:
¶11 The Rutzinski standard is met in this case.