On Point blog, page 312 of 489
OWI – Enhancer – Collateral Attack
State v. George McGee, 2010AP3040-CR, District 3, 4/26/11
court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for McGee: Steven G. Richards; case activity
McGee’s collateral attack on a prior OWI conviction used to enhance his present sentence is necessarily limited to denial of the constitutional right to counsel, ¶5. Although McGee represented himself in the challenged prior, he failed to show that his waiver of counsel was invalid.
No specific diagnosis, but evidence sufficient to support recommitment and involuntary medication
Brown County v. Quinn M., 2010AP3162, District 3, 4/26/11
court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Quinn M.: Chandra N. Harvey, SPD, Madison Appellate; case activity
Evidence held sufficient to support extension of ch. 51 commitment upheld. 1. Mental illness. Expert testified that she was certain Quinn had a mental illness, though given his history of drug and alcohol use she could not provide a specific diagnosis with certainty.
Binding Authority: Overruled Court of Appeals Decision
Adam Martine v. Quentin J. Williams, 2011 WI App 68 (recommended for publication); case activity
¶13 Prior to last year, this court applied a general rule regarding court of appeals’ cases reversed by the supreme court that “holdings not specifically reversed on appeal retain precedential value.” Blum v. 1st Auto & Cas. Ins. Co., 2010 WI 78, ¶44, 326 Wis. 2d 729, 786 N.W.2d 78 (citation omitted).
Court of Appeals Publication Orders, 4/11
court of appeals publication orders, 4/20/11
On Point posts from this list:
2011 WI App 52 State v. Winston B. Eison
2011 WI App 53 State v. James M. Drown
Plea Bargain – Breach by Defendant
State v. Christian R. Colon, 2010AP839-CR, District 1, 4/19/11
court of appeals decision (not recommended for publication); for Colon: Amelia L. Bizzaro; case activity
Colon’s refusal to testify against codefendant Rivera constituted a substantial and material breach of his plea bargain, such that the State was freed from restrictions on its allocution, ¶¶9-16.
The sheriff placed Colon in a cell with Rivera the night before Colon was to testify,
SVP: Pre-Commitment Return to DOC Custody
State v. Carl Cornelius Gilbert, Jr. / State v. Price T. Hunt, 2011 WI App 61, affirmed 2012 WI 72 (recommended for publication); for Gilbert: William J. Tyroler, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate; for Hunt: Eric James Van Schyndle, Leah Stoecker, Allison E. Cimpl-Wiemer; case activity (Gilbert), case activity (Hunt); affirmed, 2012 WI 72
SVP – Pre-Commitment Return to DOC Custody
¶1 …
3rd-Degree Sexual Assault, § 940.225(3) – Elements; Prior Inconsistent Statement; Sufficiency of Evidence
State v. Dennis J. Thornton, 2009AP3074-CR, District 2, 4/13/11
court of appeals decision (not recommended for publication); for Thornton: Angela C. Kachelski; case activity
Scienter is not an element of § 940.225(3). State v. Lederer, 99 Wis. 2d 430, 433, 299 N.W.2d 457 (Ct. App. 1980) (statute requires proof of victim’s nonconsent – in contradistinction, presumably, of defendant’s knowledge of lack of consent –
Implied Consent Law, § 343.305(5)(a)
State v. Joe R. Hechimovich, 2010AP2897-CR, District 4, 4/7/11
court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Hechimovich: Corey C. Chirafisi; case activity
Compliance with implied consent law found. Although Hechimovich initially requested a breath test, after his blood was drawn at the hospital, the deputy “gave ample opportunity” during a 10-minute period for Hechimovich to renew the request for breath test. The deputy “conclud(ed) that when Hechimovich did not bring it up following his blood test,
Complaint – Sufficiency; Standard of Review – Transcripts not in Record
State v. Michael L. Gengler, 2010AP1999, District 2, 4/6/11
court of appeals (1-judge, not for publication); pro se; case activity
¶6 The trial court determined that the complaint and the amended complaint were proper, stating,
The complaint was duly sworn on oath. The complaint was signed and filed by an assistant district attorney as prescribed by WIS. STAT. § 968.02(1). The complaint alleges multiple violations of WIS.
Reasonable Suspicion – Field Sobriety Testing
State v. Rafael Labedzki, 2010AP2501-CR, District 2, 4/6/11
court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Labedzki: Walter Arthur, Piel, Jr.; case activity
Reasonable suspicion for sobriety testing upheld, where officer had basis for concluding Labedzki was driving while intoxicated after an unchallenged stop for speeding. In brief: “Given that the trooper observed an alcoholic smell coming from Labedzki’s vehicle, a passenger who appeared drunk, bloodshot and glassy eyes on Labedzki,