On Point blog, page 2 of 2
TPR – Elements, Continuing Need of Protection and Services; Stipulation to Element; Withdrawal of Jury Demand
Walworth Co. DHHS v. Andrea L.O., 2008 WI 46, on Certification
TPR – Elements, Ground of Continuing Need of Protection and Services, Generally
Issue/Holding:
¶6 There are four elements to this ground for termination. First, the child must have been placed out of the home for a cumulative total of more than six months pursuant to court orders containing the termination of parental rights notice.
TPR–stipulation to element and effect on jury demand
Walworth Co. DHHS v. Andrea L.O., 2008 WI 46, on Certification
Issue/Holding: Stipulation to a TPR elements did not constitute withdrawal of the demand for a jury trial, where the element was submitted to, and found by, the jury under the instructions and special verdict form, ¶¶18-24.
The court approvingly analogizes to State v. Charles J. Benoit, 229 Wis.2d 630, 600 N.W.2d 193 (Ct.
TPR – Withdrawal of Element (Parental Unfitness) from Jury Consideration Amounted to Denial of Jury Trial
Manitowoc County HSD v. Allen J., 2008 WI App 137
Issue/Holding:
¶1 Allen J. appeals from orders terminating his parental rights to his children, Brandon [1] and Stephanie J. He argues that he was deprived of his right to a jury trial because the court, rather than the jury, answered one of the verdict questions on an element of parental unfitness. Allen’s counsel had stipulated that the element was satisfied,