Explore in-depth analysis
On Point is a judicial analysis blog written by members of the Wisconsin State Public Defenders. It includes cases from the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Supreme Court of Wisconsin, and the Supreme Court of the United States.
Important posts
Ahead in SCOW
Sign up
Plea-Withdrawal – Ineffective Assistance – Ch. 980-Eligibility
State v. Travis J. Guttu, 2012AP129-CR, District 3/4, 11/28/12 court of appeals decision (not recommended for publication); case activity After entering guilty pleas to multiple counts, Guttu unsuccessfully sought presentencing plea-withdrawal. After sentencing, he sought to withdraw the pleas on different grounds, more particularly: counsel was ineffective for failing to assert Guttu’s lack of knowledge […]
SVP Discharge Hearing – Showing Required, § 980.09(2)
State v. Shawn David Schulpius, 2012 WI App 134; court of appeals decision (recommended for publication); case activity SVP Discharge Hearing – Showing Required, § 980.09(2) Before granting discharge hearing on a ch. 980 petition, the circuit court must satisfy itself that the petition answers two concerns: First, under § 980.09(1) “paper-review” determination, the petition alleges sufficient facts […]
Court of Appeals Publication Orders, 11/12
court of appeals publication orders, 11/29/12 On Point posts: 2012 WI App 119 State v. Marlee F. Devries 2012 WI App 120 Godfrey & Kahn, SC v. Circ. Ct. for Milw. Co. 2012 WI App 121 State v. Robert W. Schmitt 2012 WI App 122 Ardonis Greer v. Schwarz 2012 WI App 126 State v. Ronald W. Lichty 2012 WI App 129 […]
Complaint – Adequate Notice; Jury Instructions – Authorizing Guilty Verdict on Speculation
State v. Darryl J. Badzinski, 2011AP2905-CR, District 1, 11/27/12; court of appeals decision (not recommended for publication), petition for review granted 4/18/13; reversed, 2014 WI 6; case activity Complaint – Adequate Notice (Child Sexual Assault) – Waived Objection Badzinski waived his objection to the complaint – counsel conceded, at a motion to dismiss because of vagueness, that the […]
Sentence Credit – Consecutive Sentences
State v. Cecil Lennel Hudson, 2012AP702-CR, District 1, 11/27/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, ineligible for publication); case activity Hudson isn’t entitled to credit against his new (disorderly conduct) sentence because it runs consecutive to his old (ES-revocation) sentence: ¶9 At the time of Hudson’s plea and sentencing hearing on the disorderly conduct charge, Hudson’s trial […]
Other-Acts Evidence – State’s Failure to Identify Specifics
State v. Joel Steinhauer, 2012AP189-CR, District 3, 11/27/12 court of appeals decision (not recommended for publication); case activity When the State fails to articulate the specific other acts testimony it seeks to adduce, the trial court acts within its discretion in ruling the testimony inadmissible without performing the 3-step analysis of State v. Sullivan, 216 Wis. 2d 768, […]
The Plotkin Analysis: update on draft legislation
The Legislative Council study committees I mentioned in July are beginning to work on draft legislation that will be forwarded to the Legislature for its consideration early next year. Most of the legislation affects the SPD or our clients, but two drafts are particularly noteworthy at this point. First, WLC 0010/1, being considered by the […]
Sentencing Sexual Assault-Child, § 948.02(1)(b): Mandatory Min., Probation-Ineligible
State v. Tony J. Lalicata, 2012 WI App 138 (recommended for publication); case activity Probation is not an available disposition under § 948.02(1)(b) (child sexual assault). By mandating that “the court shall impose a bifurcated sentence” with a confinement portion of at least 25 years for that offense, § 939.616 forecloses the possibility of probation: ¶14 … We […]
TPR – Meaningful Cross-Examination, § 906.11(1)
La Crosse Co. DHS v. Kristle S., 2012AP2005, District 4, 11/21/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, ineligible for publication); case activity The parent was given a meaningful opportunity to cross-examine the social worker with respect to conditions for the children’s return, in that the trial court permitted extensive questioning on these issues before instructing counsel to pursue a different […]
Habeas Procedure – Filing Deadline – “Mailbox Rule”
Elliot D. Ray v. Clements, 7th Cir No. 11-3228, 11/19/12 seventh circuit decision, appeal following remand in 592 F.3d 793 (7th Cir 2010) (summarized in prior post) … (W)e hold that in cases where the pro se prisoner’s post-conviction motion is not received, the petitioner must submit a sworn statement and some evidence to support his claim […]
On Point is sponsored by Wisconsin State Public Defenders. All content is subject to public disclosure. Comments are moderated. If you have questions about this blog, please email [email protected].
On Point provides information (not legal advice) about important developments in the law. Please note that this information may not be up to date. Viewing this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with the Wisconsin State Public Defender. Readers should consult an attorney for their legal needs.