Explore in-depth analysis
On Point is a judicial analysis blog written by members of the Wisconsin State Public Defenders. It includes cases from the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Supreme Court of Wisconsin, and the Supreme Court of the United States.
Nicole Harris v. Sheryl Thompson, 7th Cir No. 12-1088, 10/18/12
seventh circuit decision (html) (90-page pdf download: here), granting habeas relief in 904 N.E.2d 1077 (Ill. App. 2009)
A significant decision in several respects – not least, attorney performance – that a summary post cannot hope to capture, save broad highlights. Executive summary: Harris was convicted of killing her 4-year-old son Jaquari, against a defense of accidental death (self-strangulation with an elastic band). The defense had potential,
The Plotkin Analysis: SPD 2013-2015 budget request
On September 17, state agency budget requests for the 2013-2015 biennium were submitted to the Department of Administration for review prior to the introduction of the budget bill by the Governor in February 2013. While not all agency proposals will be included in the Governor’s budget, the requests give an indication of agency priorities during the next legislative session.
Following is a quick summary of selected items from our budget request:
- Full-funding of pay progression for ASPD staff.
Reasonable Suspicion, Probable Cause – OWI
court of appeals decision (1-judge, ineligible for publication); case activity
State v. Andrew Wheaton, 2012AP173-CR
Reasonable Suspicion – OWI
Presence of the following factors establish reasonable suspicion to stop Wheaton for impaired driving:
¶23 The State points to the following as factors that produced an objectively reasonable suspicion of impaired driving at the time of the stop: (1) Wheaton was driving at 3:05 a.m.,
Arrest – Fresh Pursuit
State v. Randall Lee Sugden, 2012AP408-CR, District 4, 10/15/12
court of appeals decision (1-judge, ineligible for publication); case activity
Arrest in Richland County by a Sauk County deputy sheriff was justified under the fresh pursuit doctrine, § 175.40(2). State v. Haynes, 2001 WI App 266, 248 Wis. 2d 724, 638 N.W.2d 82, discussed and applied:
¶12 Applying Haynes to the facts of this case,
Traffic Stop – “Dealer Imitation” Plate
State v. Jan P. Hogan, 2012AP966-CR, District 4, 10/25/12
court of appeals decision (1-judge, ineligible for publication); case activity
Reasonable suspicion supported stop of car displaying “dealer imitation” plate (i.e., failing to display permanent or temporary plate in violation of § 341.04(1)). State v. Griffin, 183 Wis. 2d 327, 333, 515 N.W.2d 535 (Ct. App. 1994) (OK to stop car with “license applied for”
Serial Litigation Bar – Sufficiency of Evidence
State v. Robert J. Jacobson, 2011AP581, District 2/3, 10/24/12
court of appeals decision (not recommended for publication); case activity; prior history: 2003AP2023-CR (direct appeal), 2005AP1928 (Knight petition)
Jacobson was convicted after jury trial on three counts of attempted homicide. He undertook an unsuccessful direct appeal, followed by a “Knight” habeas petition (the latter arguing that appellate counsel was ineffective in certain respects).
Probation Search: PBT Administered by Police Officer
State v. Marilee F. Devries, 2012 WI App 119 (recommended for publication); case activity
Devries’ probation agent, after detecting alcohol on her breath during a visit at the probation office, had a law enforcement officer administer a preliminary breath test. One thing led to another and she was convicted of OWI. She challenges the PBT as a police, rather than probation, search because the probation officer wasn’t involved in the test,
Plea Bargains: Validity, Good-Faith Error in Maximum Penalty
State v. Ronald W. Lichty, 2012 WI App 129(recommended for publication); case activity
Lichty pleaded no contest pursuant to plea bargain which allowed, due to a good-faith mistake, the State to recommend a period of extended supervision that exceeded the permissible maximum by one year. The error was discerned prior to sentencing, where the State reduced its extended supervision recommendation by one year. (His plea was to two counts of the same offense,
William Thompkins, Jr. v. Pfister, 7th Cir No. 10-2467, 10/23/12
seventh circuit decision, denying habeas relief in 641 N.E.2d 371 (Ill. 1994) and 521 N.E.2d 38 (1988)
Habeas Review – 6th Amendment Attachment of Counsel – State Court Findings
The Seventh Circuit rejects, on habeas review of his Illinois conviciton, Thompkins’ challenge to admissibility of his statement. Thompkins made his statement after his arrest and, according to the state court, before his initial bond hearing.
Reasonable Suspicion – Stop – “911 Hang-Up Call”
State v. Terry E. Nelson, 2012AP1418-CR, District 3, 10/23/12
court of appeals decision (1-judge, ineligible for publication); case activity
Reasonable suspicion supported stop of vehicle pulling out of driveway of house from which, shortly before, someone had called 911 but then hung up. United States v. Cohen, 481 F.3d 896 (6th Cir. 2007) (“the virtually complete lack of information conveyed by the silent 911 hang-up call and the total absence of corroborating evidence indicating that criminal activity was afoot requires us to give the 911 hang-up call little weight in evaluating the totality of the circumstances”),
Important Posts
Ahead in SCOW
Sign up
On Point is sponsored by Wisconsin State Public Defenders. All content is subject to public disclosure. Comments are moderated. If you have questions about this blog, please email [email protected].
On Point provides information (not legal advice) about important developments in the law. Please note that this information may not be up to date. Viewing this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with the Wisconsin State Public Defender. Readers should consult an attorney for their legal needs.