Explore in-depth analysis

On Point is a judicial analysis blog written by members of the Wisconsin State Public Defenders. It includes cases from the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Supreme Court of Wisconsin, and the Supreme Court of the United States.

Sentencing – Bifurcated, Enhanced Misdemeanor

State v. Lavon J. Ash, Sr., 2012AP381-CR, District 2, 8/15/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, ineligible for publication); case activity Ash was sentenced to concurrent terms of one-year initial confinement, one-year extended supervision on two misdemeanor counts, a sentence structure he successfully challenges. Incompatible statutory mandates lie at the heart of the problem. In the first […]

Search & Seizure – Curtilage: Attached Garage

Village of Oregon v. Jeremy Florin, 2011AP1708, District 4, 8/16/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, ineligible for publication); case activity Suspected of drunk driving, Florin was followed by a police officer to his home, ignored the officer’s command to stop, and went inside via an open garage. The officer entered the still-open garage, knocked on […]

Traffic Stop – Reasonable Suspicion

Village of Jackson v. John W. Hespe, 2012AP680-FT, District 2, 8/15/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, ineligible for publication); case activity “Unsafe,” but not necessarily “illegal” rate of speed supported traffic stop, State v. Anagnos, 2012 WI 64, 341 Wis. 2d 576, 815 N.W.2d 675, followed: ¶6        Here, Hespe contends that while the court found that […]

Miranda-Edwards Interrogation Rule: Unequivocal Request for Counsel – Reinitiation of Interrogation

State v. Pierre R. Conner, 2012 WI App 105 (recommended for publication); case activity Interrogations – Miranda-Edwards Rule – Unequivocal Request for Counsel  The issues on a request-for-counsel challenge to in-custody interrogation are whether the individual  unequivocally invoked his right to counsel and, if so, whether he subsequently reinitiated questioning, Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 484-85 (1981). Although the trial […]

Reasonable Suspicion – Prolonged Stop

State v. Johnnie Austin, 2011AP2953-CR, District 1, 8/14/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, ineligible for publication); case activity Continued detention of Austin, following an indisputably proper stop for illegal parking, was supported by reasonable suspicion: ¶14      This court disagrees; the trial court properly found Officer Tisher’s continued detention of Austin reasonable.  If, during a valid traffic stop, an […]

Reasonable Suspicion – Drug Activity

State v. Craig R. Moss, 2012AP259-CR, District 3, 8/14/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, ineligible for publication); case activity Terry stop of Moss’s car supported by reasonable suspicion of involvement in drug activity: ¶10      While patrolling a high crime area in the middle of the night, Steffens observed a vehicle stop briefly in front of a known drug house.  When […]

TPR – Default Judgment, Grounds

State v. Yvette A., 2012AP548, District 1, 8/14/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); case activity Parent’s failure to appear at grounds phase of TPR trial, because she was locked in a mental health unit, supported default judgment, where parent had documented history of checking herself into hospitals despite actual need for psychiatric […]

Reasonable Suspicion – Traffic Stop, OWI – Informant’s Tip

State v. Michael P. Green, 2011AP2137-CR, District 2, 8/8/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); case activity Traffic stop, based on report by gas station attendant of suspected drunk driver, was sufficiently reliable to support investigatory stop. ¶10      This court has previously held that a tip shows sufficient indicia of reliability to justify an […]

Self-Representation

State v. Anthony S. Irving, 2011AP1908-CR, District 2, 8/8/12 court of appeals decision (not recommended for publication); case activity A defendant has a constitutional right to self-representation, State v. Imani, 2010 WI 66, ¶20, 326 Wis. 2d 179, 786 N.W.2d 40, but it must be triggered by a “clear and unequivocal” request for self-representation, State v. Darby, […]

TPR – Best Interests Determination

Grant Co. DSS v. Elizabeth M. R., 2012AP1059, District 4, 8/9/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, ineligible for publication); case activity By failing to consider whether the child had a substantial relationship with the parent, § 48.426(3), the trial court erroneously exercised discretion in concluding that termination of parental rights was in the child’s bests […]

On Point is sponsored by Wisconsin State Public Defenders. All content is subject to public disclosure. Comments are moderated. If you have questions about this blog, please email [email protected].

On Point provides information (not legal advice) about important developments in the law. Please note that this information may not be up to date. Viewing this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with the Wisconsin State Public Defender. Readers should consult an attorney for their legal needs.