Explore in-depth analysis
On Point is a judicial analysis blog written by members of the Wisconsin State Public Defenders. It includes cases from the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Supreme Court of Wisconsin, and the Supreme Court of the United States.
Important posts
Ahead in SCOW
Sign up
In Re: Bridget Boyle-Saxton, 7th Cir No. D-12-0002, 2/2/12
7th circuit decision, imposing discipline Sanctions – Abandonment of Client It is apparent from this final motion for additional time that Boyle-Saxton elected to put work for other clients ahead of her obligations to Rodriguez and this court. That is unprofessional; lawyers have an ethical obligation to take no more work than they can perform. […]
Dale J. Atkins v. Zenk, 7th Cir No. 11-1891, 1/31/12
7th circuit decision, denying habeas in relief Habeas – Standard of Review – Ineffective Assistance of Counsel When “no state court has squarely addressed the merits” of a habeas claim, however, we review the claim under the pre-AEDPA standard of 28 U.S.C. § 2243. Under this “more generous standard,” George v. Smith, 586 F.3d 479, […]
TPR – Request for Admissions
Dane Co. DHS v. Kevin D., 2011AP2748, District 4, 2/2/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Kevin: Steven Zaleski; case activity Kevin’s failure to respond to the County requests for admission, § 804.11(2), led the trial court to deem those requests admitted, and then to grant summary judgment as to grounds based […]
TPR – Jury Instructions: Waiver of Issue; Ineffective Assistance
Heather T. C. v. Donald M. H., 2010AP467, District 2, 2/1/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Donald: Thomas K. Voss; case activity Failure to object at trial waived appellate challenge to jury instructions and verdict form that combined two separate periods of abandonment as grounds for termination. ¶6 Failure to object to proposed jury instructions or […]
Sentence Review: New Factor – Substantial Assistance to Law Enforcement
State v. Anthony C. Boyden, 2012 WI App 38 (recommended for publication); for Boyden: Rex Anderegg; case activity Information provided by Boyden before his sentencing, which didn’t bear fruit until much later, supported a new factor-based request for sentence modification. State v. Doe, 2005 WI App 68, 280 Wis. 2d 731, 697 N.W.2d 101, followed. ¶14 Boyden’s […]
Traffic Stop: Failure to Display Front Plate
State v. Terrence T. Boyd, 2012 WI App 39 (recommended for publication); for Boyd: Andrea Taylor Cornwall, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate; case activity Because Boyd’s car was registered in a state (Illinois) that issues two plates, car could be stopped for failing to display a plate on the front, in violation of § 341.15(1) (“[w]henever 2 registration […]
Mental Health Commitment – Dangerousness
Winnebago County v. Nathan W., 2011AP2099, District 2, 2/1/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Nathan W.: Martha K. Askins, SPD, Madison Appellate; case activity ¶3 Here, Dr. Zerrien’s testimony at the commitment hearing supported the circuit court’s commitment order. Dr. Zerrien was Nathan’s treating psychiatrist. Dr. Zerrien testified based on his treatment of Nathan and his […]
Juror Bias / Disqualification – Waiver of Issue: Use of Peremptory to Remove Juror
State v. Sharon A. Sellhausen, 2012 WI 5, reversing 2010 WI App 175; for Sellhausen: Byron C. Lichstein; case activity The trial judge’s daughter-in-law was part of the jury pool; Sellhausen didn’t seek her removal for cause, but used a peremptory to strike her, which rendered harmless any possible error in the trial judge sua sponte failing to […]
Fleeing, Elements: “Willful or Wanton Disregard”; Evidence – Character Trait of “Victim,” § 904.04(1)(b)
State v. Daniel H. Hanson, 2012 WI 4, affirming 2010 WI App 146; for Hanson: Robert R. Henak, Chad Lanning; case activity Fleeing, § 346.04(3) – Elements: “Willful or Wanton Disregard” Fleeing does not require “an evil or malicious state of mind” when disregarding an officer’s signal: ¶22 In Wis. Stat. § 346.04(3), “willful” modifies “disregard.” In that context, “willful” requires […]
Sentencing Enhancer – Proof
State v. Christopher J. Holan, 2011AP1717-CR, District 3, 1/31/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Holan: Martha K. Askins; case activity Holan’s admission to his prior felony conviction satisfied § 973.12(1); the court rejects his argument that the record must show his knowledge that he faced increased punishment because of the prior […]
On Point is sponsored by Wisconsin State Public Defenders. All content is subject to public disclosure. Comments are moderated. If you have questions about this blog, please email [email protected].
On Point provides information (not legal advice) about important developments in the law. Please note that this information may not be up to date. Viewing this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with the Wisconsin State Public Defender. Readers should consult an attorney for their legal needs.