Explore in-depth analysis

On Point is a judicial analysis blog written by members of the Wisconsin State Public Defenders. It includes cases from the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Supreme Court of Wisconsin, and the Supreme Court of the United States.

TPR — Exercise of discretion in determining disposition

Barron County v. Tara H., 2012AP2390, District 3, 1/15/13 Court of appeals decision (1-judge, ineligible for publication); case activity TPR — Exercise of discretion in determining disposition The circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion by failing to consider one of the six factors under § 48.426(3)–specifically, whether the child had a substantial relationship with Tara or […]

Traffic stop – tail lamp violation

State v. Antonio D. Brown, 2013 WI App 17, petition for review granted 10/15/13; case activity Police lacked probable cause to stop Brown for a defective tail lamp, § 347.13, based on one unlit bulb (out of four) in the tail lamp assembly: ¶19 The parties agree with the circuit court’s finding that the police […]

Habeas Procedure: Certificate of Appealability, Defects and Jurisdiction – Petition-Filing Limitation Period

Rafel Arriaza Gonzalez v. Thaler, USSC No. 10-895, 1/10/12, affirming 623 F. 3d 222 (5th Cir. 2010) Habeas Procedure – Certificate of Appealability, Defects and Jurisdiction  … 28 U. S. C. §2253(c), provides that a habeas petitioner must obtain a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal a federal district court’s final order in a habeas […]

Exculpatory Evidence – “Materiality”

Juan Smith v. Cain, USSC No. 10-8145, 1/10/12 Statements by the sole eyewitness, who identified Smith at trial as one of the perpetrators, that in fact he couldn’t see the faces of the perpetrators were “material” to determination of Smith’s guilt. Therefore, the state’s failure to disclose these statements before trial violated Smith’s due process […]

Identification Procedure – Improper Law Enforcement (vs. “Happenstance”)

Barion Perry v. New Hampshire, USSC No. 10-8974, 1/11/12, affirming State v. Perry (N.H. sup. ct. 11/18/10) For purposes of due process, a pretrial identification isn’t suppressible unless the product of improper law enforcement activity. We have not extended pretrial screening for reliability to cases in which the suggestive circumstances were not arranged by law enforcement officers. Petitioner […]

OWI – Sufficiency of Evidence; Closing Argument – Explanation of Element (“Operate,” OWI)

City of Beloit v. Steven A. Herbst, Sr., 2010AP2197, District 4, 1/12/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Herbst: Tracey A. Wood; case activity Evidence held sufficient to support OWI conviction, where Herbst was found in parked car, slumped over the steering wheel with the engine running, along with evidence that the designated driver […]

Traffic Stop – Duration

State v. Heather M. Kolman, 2011AP1917-CR, District 4, 1/12/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Kolman: John C. Orth; case activity  Scope of a concededly proper traffic stop (for defective brake light) wasn’t unlawfully expanded by testing Kolman for signs of intoxication (reciting alphabet; “mini” HGN test). ¶15      Most relevant here, and as discussed […]

Dismissal with Prejudice

State v. Leon A. Wedde, 2011AP130-CR, District 2, 1/11/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); pro se; case activity The trial court dismissed with prejudice the pending charge when the prosecutor was unable to proceed on the scheduled date. The State argues that dismissal should have been without prejudice, and the court of […]

Sentencing Review

State v. Frederick W. Scheuers, 2011AP1709-CR, District 2, 1/11/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Scheuers: Jeffrey Mann; case activity Sentence of 7 months for criminal damage to property, upheld as proper exercise of discretion. ¶9        Scheuers acknowledges that the trial court “took into account and properly stated on the record what [it] believed […]

TPR – Admission Procedure

Racine County HSD v. Roseannah M. H., 2011AP1776, District 2, 1/11/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Roseannah: Patrick Flanagan; case activity On this TPR appeal by the County, the court of appeals upholds an order granting Roseannah’s motion to withdraw her admission to grounds. Such an admission must be knowing, intelligent […]

On Point is sponsored by Wisconsin State Public Defenders. All content is subject to public disclosure. Comments are moderated. If you have questions about this blog, please email [email protected].

On Point provides information (not legal advice) about important developments in the law. Please note that this information may not be up to date. Viewing this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with the Wisconsin State Public Defender. Readers should consult an attorney for their legal needs.