Explore in-depth analysis
On Point is a judicial analysis blog written by members of the Wisconsin State Public Defenders. It includes cases from the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Supreme Court of Wisconsin, and the Supreme Court of the United States.
Important posts
Ahead in SCOW
Sign up
Defendant’s Right (Not) to Testify
State v. Rickey R. Denson, 2011 WI 70, affirming unpublished summary order; for Denson: Donna Odrzywolski; case activity ¶8 A criminal defendant’s constitutional right not to testify is a fundamental right that must be waived knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently. However, we conclude that circuit courts are not required to conduct an on-the-record colloquy to determine whether a defendant […]
Statutory Construction – Legislative Acquiesence / History
Steven T. Kilian v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, 2011 WI 65; case activity Statutory Construction – Legislative Acquiesence ¶30 n. 12: “Legislative failure to act is ordinarily weak evidence of legislative intention to acquiesce in or countenance a judicial or executive branch interpretation. . . . Under proper circumstances, however, inaction by the legislature may be […]
Recusal / Disqualification, Supreme Court Justice: Reviewability of Individual Decision
order denying motion for reconsideration of in: State v. Dimitri Henley, 2011 WI 67; for Henley: Keith A. Findley; case activity; additional history: 2010 WI 12 (memorandum decision, Roggensack, J.); court order (5/24/10) Henley’s motion to reconsider, though directed formally to the decision reversing grant of new trial, as a practical matter is directed to reconsideration […]
Jury Instructions – Elements, Exposing Child to Harmful Materials, § 948.11(2)(a)
State v. Esteban M. Gonzalez, 2011 WI 63, reversing, 2010 WI App 104; for Gonzalez: Frank J. Schiro, Kristin Anne Hodorowski; case activity Gonzalez has shown a reasonable likelihood that the jury instructions relived the State of its burden to prove the element that he knowingly exhibited harmful material to a child. The facts are essentially […]
Juror Bias – Assessment, Generally / Child Sexual Assault
State v. David D. Funk, 2011 WI 62, reversing unpublished summary disposition; for Funk: Michele Anne Tjader; case activity Juror Bias – Assessment, Generally A claim of juror bias relies requires proof of the two-step test articulated by State v. Wyss, 124 Wis. 2d 681, 726, 370 N.W.2d 745 (1985): “(1) that the juror incorrectly or incompletely responded […]
Search & Seizure – Private Action
County of Jefferson v. Karla J. Raue, 2010AP3131, District 4, 7/7/11 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Raue: Walter Arthur Piel, Jr.; case activity Act of bar patron (turning off car and taking key from Raue) was private, non-governmental action, therefore didn’t implicate Raue’s 4th amendment rights. State v. Butler, 2009 WI […]
Reasonable Suspicion – Traffic Stop
State v. Randy L. TeStroette, 2011AP290-CR, District 2, 7/6/11 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for TeStroete: Kirk B. Obear, Casey J. Hoff; case activity Report from named (therefore non-anonymous) citizen of “possible intoxicated driver,” describing the vehicle’s location, plate number and color, supplied reasonable suspicion to stop TeStroete’s car, even though the officer himself […]
Mr. Badger’s Independence Day Linkfest
Mayor La Guardia on legal writing. Dominique Srauss-Kahn prosecution: Reminiscent of Tawana Brawley? Or of Michael Nifong? Or is it just possible that there there is no thematic connection to be made, simply because DSK got “what most defendants never get — early Brady material”? Michael Cicchini: Bad as the job picture for newly minted lawyers might be […]
Guest Post: Daniel D. Blinka, “Bullcoming Arrives, But Where’s the Path?”
On Point is very pleased to present this Guest Post discussion of Bullcoming v. New Mexico by Daniel D. Blinka, Professor of Law, Marquette University of Virginia. (Cross-posted at Marquette.) Professor Brandon L. Garrett, Virginia, also has a Guest Post on Bullcoming. Feel free to submit comments in the box at the end of the Post. Note […]
Guest Post: Brandon L. Garrett, “No Surrogate Forensics”
On Point is very pleased to present this Guest Post discussion of Bullcoming v. New Mexico by Brandon L. Garrett, Professor of Law, University of Virginia. (Cross-posted at ACS. On Point has made a minor editing change in the first sentence, to add the date of decision.) Professor Garret has previously guest-posted on DNA and habeas procedure. Professor Daniel […]
On Point is sponsored by Wisconsin State Public Defenders. All content is subject to public disclosure. Comments are moderated. If you have questions about this blog, please email [email protected].
On Point provides information (not legal advice) about important developments in the law. Please note that this information may not be up to date. Viewing this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with the Wisconsin State Public Defender. Readers should consult an attorney for their legal needs.