Explore in-depth analysis

On Point is a judicial analysis blog written by members of the Wisconsin State Public Defenders. It includes cases from the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Supreme Court of Wisconsin, and the Supreme Court of the United States.

Appellate Procedure: Harmless Error (Verdict Forms) – Waiver (Failure to Object to Testimony)

State v. Andre D. Hansbrough, 2011 WI App 79(recommended for publication); for Hansbrough: Amelia L. Bizzaro; case activity Verdict Forms – Harmless Error Failure to provide a not guilty verdict option with a lesser included offense instruction is, although error, not structural but is instead subject to analysis for harmlessness, ¶¶10-17. ¶9        At the outset, we […]

IAC Claim – Denial without Hearing

State v. Robert L. Brinson, 2010AP001819-CR, District 1, 5/10/11 court of appeals decision (3-judge, not recommended for publication); for Brinson: Paul Bugenhagen, Jr.; case activity Cautionary instruction cured any potential prejudice from revelation of prior record. ¶16      We disagree.  The trial court instructed the jury several times that it could not consider Brinson’s possible status as a probationer or parolee, or the […]

Consent to Search: Co-Tenant; Counsel: Request for Substitute; Personal Presence: Forfeiture by Misconduct; Right to Testify: Waiver; Judicial Bias: Lapse in Decorum

State v. Calvin Jerome Pirtle, 2011 WI App 89(recommended for publication); for Pirtle: Christopher J. Cherella; case activity Consent to Search – Georgia v. Randolph Pirtle’s failure to object to the police presence allowed them to act on the co-tenant’s consent to a warrantless search under Georgia v. Randolph, 547 U.S. 103 (2006): ¶15      In […]

Sentence Modification – New Factor: Test / Mental Health Background; Counsel – Effective Assistance – Sentencing

State v. Shantell T. Harbor, 2011 WI 28, affirming unpublished decision; for Harbor: Joseph E. Redding; case activity Sentence Modification – New Factor The “new factor” test for sentence modification has split into “two divergent lines of cases”: Rosado v. State, 70 Wis. 2d 280, 288, 234 N.W.2d 69 (1975) (fact(s) highly relevant to, but not brought out at, sentencing […]

Disorderly Conduct, § 947.01 – Sufficiency of Evidence; Resisting, § 946.41(1) – Jury Instructions

State v. Robert Lyle Lawver, Jr., 2010AP382-CR, District 4, 5/5/11 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Lawver: Cole Daniel Ruby; case activity Conviction for disorderly conduct upheld on following facts: ¶9        The pertinent facts include the following.  Lawver was walking at night down an unlit highway, traveling with traffic, so that he […]

Collateral Attack – OWI Prior

State v. Brian M. Joski, 2010AP2223-CR, District 3, 5/3/11 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Joski: Thomas J. Coaty; case activity A prior conviction used to enhance a new sentence may be collaterally attacked on the basis of violation of right to counsel, in other words, that the defendant didn’t validly waive counsel within […]

Confrontation – Dying Declaration; Hearsay – Prior Inconsistent Statements

State v. Marvin L. Beauchamp, 2011 WI 27, affirming 2010 WI App 42; for Beauchamp: Craig S. Powell; case activity Confrontation – Dying Declaration, § 908.045(3) ¶34  We therefore, like every state court that has considered the dying declaration exception since Crawford, take a position consistent with the language of Crawford and Giles and decline […]

Miranda – “Interrogation”

State v. Randy L. Martin, 2010AP505-CR, District 1, 5/3/11 court of appeals decision (3-judge, not recommended for publication), reversed, 2012 WI 96; for Martin: Byron C. Lichstein; case activity Although Martin was in custody and had not received Miranda warnings, his statement wasn’t the result of “interrogation” and therefore wasn’t suppressible. When it appeared that Martin’s […]

Conspiracy, § 939.31: “Overt Act”; Guilty Plea Factual Basis: de novo Review

State v. Eliseo Peralta, 2011 WI App 81(recommended for publication); for Peralta: Martin J. Pruhs; case activity Conspiracy, § 939.31 – “Overt Act” The “overt act” element of conspiracy, though it must go “beyond mere planning and agreement,” may be “virtually any act,” even if “insignificant,” ¶¶19-21. Thus, Peralta’s “communication to an undercover police detective […]

Gordon E. Sussman v. Jenkins, 7th Cir No. 09-3940, 4/28/11

in-chambers opinion on motion to stay mandate Habeas – Stay of Mandate The State’s request to stay the mandate in the court’s grant of relief is denied by Judge Ripple’s in chambers opinion. The standard for granting a stay is set forth in Books v. City of Elkhart, 239 F.3d 826, 828 (7th Cir. 2001): […]

On Point is sponsored by Wisconsin State Public Defenders. All content is subject to public disclosure. Comments are moderated. If you have questions about this blog, please email [email protected].

On Point provides information (not legal advice) about important developments in the law. Please note that this information may not be up to date. Viewing this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with the Wisconsin State Public Defender. Readers should consult an attorney for their legal needs.