Explore in-depth analysis
On Point is a judicial analysis blog written by members of the Wisconsin State Public Defenders. It includes cases from the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Supreme Court of Wisconsin, and the Supreme Court of the United States.
Important posts
Ahead in SCOW
Sign up
Briefing – Nomenclature
Donna J. Murr v. St. Croix County Board of Adjustment, 2008AP2728, District 3, 2/15/11 court of appeals decision (recommended for publication); case activity ¶18 n. 11: The Board’s response brief repeatedly refers to Murr as plaintiff. We remind counsel that references should be to names, not party designations. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.19(1)(i). Surpassingly minor […]
SVP – Petition for Discharge – Request for Independent Examiner, Hearing: Alleged Change of Diagnosis
State v. Kenneth R. Parrish, 2010AP809, District 1, 2/15/11 court of appeals decision (3-judge, not recommended for publication); for Parrish: Ellen Henak, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate; case activity; Parrish BiC; State Resp.; Reply SVP – Petition for Discharge – Request for Independent Examiner Parrish’s failure to unequivocally request appointment of an independent examiner dooms his argument […]
Stalking, § 940.32: Notice of Charge, “Course of Conduct” / Elevation from Class I to H Felony Status
State v. Janet A. Conner, 2011 WI 8, affirming 2009 WI App 143; for Conner: Stephen E. Mays; case activity; Conner BiC; State Resp.; Reply Stalking, § 940.32 – Notice of Charge, “Course of Conduct” Stalking requires proof of, among other elements, a “course of conduct” which “means a series of 2 or more acts carried out […]
TPR – Condition of Return; Best Interests Analysis
State v. Abigail W., 2010AP2792, District 1, 2/10/11 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Abigail W.: Jeffrey W. Jensen; case activity TPR – Condition of Return CHIPS condition that parent “show that you can care for and supervise your child properly and that you understand [her] special needs” wasn’t an impossible condition but, rather, was […]
Counsel Sanctions: Violation of No-Cite Rule
Shirley Anderson v. Northwood School District, 2011 WI App 31; case activity ¶7 n. 3: Northwood cites a circuit court decision from another case as persuasive authority, correctly noting that such a citation does not violate WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3), which prohibits citing unpublished appellate cases decided before July 1, 2009. However, Northwood then emphasizes we affirmed the […]
State v. Sharon A. Sellhausen, 2010 WI App 175, review granted 2/8/11
court of appeals decision; for Sellhausen: Byron C. Lichstein; case activity Issues (formulated by On Point): Whether a trial judge has a sua sponte duty to strike a prosepctive juror who is an in-law of the judge. Whether defense counsel’s use of a peremptory strike to remove the judge’s in-law renders harmless any error in the […]
State v. Joseph J. Spaeth, 2009AP2907-CR, review granted 2/8/11
on certification; for Spaeth: Shelley Fite, SPD, Madison Appellate; case activity Issue (formulated by On Point): Whether a statement made to law enforcement following a probationer’s honest accounting to his probation agent may derive from a “legitimate source wholly independent of compelled testimony” and therefore admissible in a criminal case, notwithstanding the promise of immunity for such statements when made to probation […]
State v. David W. Domke, No. 2009AP2422-CR, review granted, 2/8/11
decision below: unpublished; case activity Issues (formulated by On Point): Whether Domke was denied effective assistance of counsel by trial counsel’s: failure to object to inadmissible hearsay in the form of a social worker’s testimony reciting the complainant’s recitation of the alleged sexual assaults; producing, without first interviewing her, the complainant’s mother as a defense witness who […]
State v. Arthur J. Anderson, 2010AP1673-CR, District 3, 2/8/11
court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Anderson: Susan E. Alesia, SPD, Madison Appellate; case activity; Anderson BiC; State Resp.; Reply Guilty Plea – Criminal Damage to Property – Factual Basis ¶6 To be found guilty of criminal damage to property, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that: 1. The defendant caused damage […]
Ch. 51 Recommitment – Instruction on Dangerousness, Sufficiency of Evidence
Oneida County v. Michael B., 2010AP002216-FT, District 3, 2/8/11 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Michael B.: Lora B. Cerone. SPD, Madison Appellate; case activity Mental Recommitment – Instruction on Dangerousness The following oral jury instruction didn’t impermissibly direct the jury to find dangerousness, on trial for mental recommitment: “This is a recommitment proceeding, […]
On Point is sponsored by Wisconsin State Public Defenders. All content is subject to public disclosure. Comments are moderated. If you have questions about this blog, please email [email protected].
On Point provides information (not legal advice) about important developments in the law. Please note that this information may not be up to date. Viewing this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with the Wisconsin State Public Defender. Readers should consult an attorney for their legal needs.