Explore in-depth analysis
On Point is a judicial analysis blog written by members of the Wisconsin State Public Defenders. It includes cases from the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Supreme Court of Wisconsin, and the Supreme Court of the United States.
Important posts
Ahead in SCOW
Sign up
Ch. 51 Recommitment – Instruction on Dangerousness, Sufficiency of Evidence
Oneida County v. Michael B., 2010AP002216-FT, District 3, 2/8/11 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Michael B.: Lora B. Cerone. SPD, Madison Appellate; case activity Mental Recommitment – Instruction on Dangerousness The following oral jury instruction didn’t impermissibly direct the jury to find dangerousness, on trial for mental recommitment: “This is a recommitment proceeding, […]
Sanctions
City of Shawano v. Darlene F. Sense, 2010AP2193-FT, District 3, 2/8/11 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); case activity; Memo Br.; Memo Resp.; Memo Reply ¶10 As a final matter, we address certain deficiencies in Sense’s appellate brief. First, Sense’s repeated references to “appellant” and “respondent” throughout her brief violate WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19(1)(i), which requires reference […]
State v. Daniel H. Hanson, 2010 WI App 146, review granted 2/8/11
on petition for review of published decision; for Hanson: Robert R. Henak, Chad A. Lanning; case activity Issues (provided by court): Whether a driver of a vehicle can be convicted of attempting to elude a law enforcement officer under Wis. Stat. § 346.04(3) while on a cell phone with a 911 intake dispatcher and driving to a police […]
TPR – Plea to Grounds
Brown County Dept. of Human Services v. Brenda B., 2011 WI 6, affirming unpublished decision; for Brenda B.: Leonard D. Kachinsky; case activity ¶3 Given that a finding of parental unfitness does not necessarily result in an involuntary termination of parental rights, we determine that the circuit court was not obligated to inform Brenda that […]
Richard M. Fischer v. Van Hollen, 741 F. Supp. 2d 944, 960 (E.D. Wis. 2011)
district court decision, denying respondent’s motion to amend judgment granting habeas relief (post on original grant, here). Habeas – State’s Waiver The State’s failure to raise certain arguments, prior to grant of 2254 relief, waived its right to press those points on a Rule 59 motion to amend the judgment granting relief. The respondent in […]
Remedial Contempt
Koch v. Neumann, 2010AP1531, District 3, 2/1/11 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); case activity; BiC; Resp.; Reply The contemnor argues that a remedial sanction (30 days’ jail, stayed for 1 year conditioned on no further violations of prior judgment) imposed by the trial court was unsupported because the contemptuous conduct had already […]
Traffic Stop
County of Sheboygan v. William M. Lane, 2010AP1756, District 2, 2/2/11 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Lane: George Limbeck; case activity; State BiC; Lane Resp. ¶6 As a threshold matter, the County addresses the proper test for assessing the validity of the traffic stop. The County contends that the appropriate standard is […]
TPR – Voluntariness of Plea
Portage Co. HHS v. Jesus S., 2010AP2698, District 4, 2/3/11 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Jesus S.: Theresa J. Schmieder; case activity For a no-contest plea to a TPR petition to be knowing and voluntary, the parent must be notified of the direct consequences of his or her plea, including an […]
Consent to Search
State v. Robert L. Stokes, 2009AP919-CR, District 1, 2/1/11 court of appeals decision (3-judge, not recommended for publication); for Stokes: John M. Bolger; case activity; Stokes BiC; State Resp.; Reply Given trial court credibility findings, the resident’s consent to the police to enter and search was voluntary. ¶19 Finally, we are not convinced by Robert’s argument […]
Repeated Sexual Assault – Sufficiency of Evidence; Effective Assistance of Counsel
State v. Darrell Lemont Otis, 2010AP589, District 1, 2/1/11 court of appeals decision (3-judge, not recommended for publication); for Otis: Bryan C. Lichstein; case activity; Otis BiC; State Resp.; Reply Repeated Sexual Assault – Sufficiency of Evidence Repeated sexual assault, § 948.025(1)(b), requires proof of 3 elements: 3 or more sexual assaults; within a specified period of […]
On Point is sponsored by Wisconsin State Public Defenders. All content is subject to public disclosure. Comments are moderated. If you have questions about this blog, please email [email protected].
On Point provides information (not legal advice) about important developments in the law. Please note that this information may not be up to date. Viewing this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with the Wisconsin State Public Defender. Readers should consult an attorney for their legal needs.