Explore in-depth analysis

On Point is a judicial analysis blog written by members of the Wisconsin State Public Defenders. It includes cases from the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Supreme Court of Wisconsin, and the Supreme Court of the United States.

Traffic Stop – High-Beam Violation

State v. Joseph F. Brown, 2010AP832-CR, District 4, 10/14/10 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Brown: Adam Walsh; BiC; Resp. It violates § 347.12(1)(a) to flash high-beam headlights within 500 feet of an oncoming vehicle if the latter’s high-beams are not themselves lit. Because Brown flashed his high-beams within 500 feet of […]

Motion to withdraw Plea, Pre-Sentence; Motion to withdraw Plea – Ineffective Assistance

State v. John M. Anthony, 2009AP2171-CR, District 1, 10/13/10 court of appeals decision (3-judge, not recommended for publication); pro se; Resp. Br. Motion to withdraw Plea, Pre-Sentence Based on trial court findings that Anthony decision to plead no contest was based on his attorney’s informed assessment that he was likely to be found guilty if he […]

Jury Instructions; Ineffective Assistance; Record on Appeal; Self-Defense

State v. Morris L. Harris, 2009AP2833-CR,  District 1, 10/13/10 court of appeals decision (3-judge, not recommended for publication); for Harris: Gary Grass; BiC; Resp.; Reply Lesser-Included Instruction – Battery Harris not entitled to instruction on simple battery as lesser included of substantial battery; the medical evidence established without contradiction that the victim suffered a fractured rib, therefore no […]

Community Caretaker – Frisk

State v. Dennis Butler, 2010AP864-CR, District 2, 10/13/10  court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Butler: Kathleen A. Lindgren; BiC; Resp. Frisk upheld, where initial contact came within community caretaker function, and Butler then gave cause to believe he was armed and dangerous. ¶13      We hold that Pergande properly exercised his community caretaker function during […]

CCW – Constitutionality – Second Amendment

State v. Joshua D. Schultz, Clark County Case No. 10-CM-138, 10/12/10 Clark County circuit court decision; for Schultz: William Poss, SPD Trial, Black River Falls The complaint in this matter alleges that on June 10, 2010, the defendant was carrying a concealed weapon, a knife in the waistband of his pants which was covered by […]

Evidence – Disorderly Conduct – Relevance

State v. Salvador Cruz, 2010AP911-CR, District 2, 10/13/10 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Cruz: Matthew S. Pinix; BiC; Resp.; Reply Evidence of the effect of the defendant’s (alleged disorderly) conduct was relevant, without a showing of “proximity” to that conduct: ¶13      A.S. instructs that “[i]n addition to considering the potential effects of a defendant’s […]

Camreta v. Greene, USSC No. 09-1454 / Alford v. Greene, No. 09-1478, cert granted 10/12/10

Consolidated cases: Camreta Docket Decision Below (9th Cir) Question Presented (from SCOTUSblog): Whether the Fourth Amendment requires a warrant, a court order, parental consent, or exigent circumstances before law enforcement and child welfare officials may conduct a temporary seizure and interview at a public school of a child whom they reasonably suspect was being sexually […]

Bullcoming v. New Mexico, USSC No. 09-10876, cert grant 9/28/10

Docket Decision Below (New Mexico supreme court) Question Presented: Whether the Confrontation Clause permits the prosecution to introduce testimonial statements of a nontestifying forensic analyst through the in-court testimony of a supervisor or other person who did not perform or observe the laboratory analysis described in the statements. Cert. Petition State’s Brief Opposing Cert SCOTUSblog […]

TPR – Summary Judgment on Grounds (Abandonment)

Nathan Y. v. Tarik T., 2010AP992, District IV, 10/7/10 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Tarik T.: Philip J. Brehm The court rejects the argument that under Steven V. v. Kelley H., 2004 WI 47, ¶36, summary judgment is inappropriate when the ground alleged is abandonment. ¶7        …  First, Steven V. explained that […]

TPR – Telephonic Appearance

Grant Co. DSS v. Stacy K. S., 2010AP1678, District IV, 10/7/10 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Stacy K.: Donna L. Hintze, SPD, Madison Appellate The circuit court may take the parent’s admission telephonically at the grounds phase of a TPR; neither § 48.422(7)(a) nor § 807.13 requires physical presence. ¶16      Addressing first the requirements […]

On Point is sponsored by Wisconsin State Public Defenders. All content is subject to public disclosure. Comments are moderated. If you have questions about this blog, please email [email protected].

On Point provides information (not legal advice) about important developments in the law. Please note that this information may not be up to date. Viewing this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with the Wisconsin State Public Defender. Readers should consult an attorney for their legal needs.