Explore in-depth analysis
On Point is a judicial analysis blog written by members of the Wisconsin State Public Defenders. It includes cases from the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Supreme Court of Wisconsin, and the Supreme Court of the United States.
Important posts
Ahead in SCOW
Sign up
First Amendment – Overbreadth: Sexual Assault of Child, § 948.02, Not Unconstitutionally Overbroad re: “Proper Medical Purpose”
State v. Christopher J. Lesik, 2010 WI App 12, PFR filed For Lesik: Anthony Cotton Issue/Holding: Sexual assault (intercourse) of a child, § 948.02, isn’t unconstitutionally overbroad, against a theory that it criminalizes acts undertaken for “proper medical purpose.” Although the statute is silent with respect to medical conduct, potential overbreadth may be cured through judicial construction […]
Eric Pressley v. Georgia, USSC No. 09–5270, 1/19/10
US Supreme Court decision Public Trial – Closing Courtroom for Voir Dire Sixth Amendment right to a public trial in criminal cases extends to jury selection phase. Failure to consider alternatives to closure violated this right (“trial courts are required to consider alternatives to closure even when they are not offered by the parties”). Nor […]
Briscoe v. Virginia, USSC No. 07-11191, 1/25/10
Confrontation – Lab Report USSC decision. An order, really, not an opinion, tantamount to a “GVR” (Grant, Vacate, Remand): PER CURIAM. We vacate the judgment of the Supreme Court of Virginia and remand the case for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion in Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, 557 U. S. ___ (2009). Significance, as explained by Briscoe’s attorney and […]
State v. Jermichael James Carroll, 2010 WI 8, affirming 2008 WI App 161
supreme court decision; court of appeals decision; for Carroll: Michael K. Gould, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate Frisk – Demand that Suspect Drop Object Frisk analysis applies to police demand that suspect drop object in hand, ¶22. ¶23 Here, Carroll led officers on a high-speed chase in a car that the officers had been observing in connection with an […]
State v. Richard M. Fischer, 2010 WI 6, affirming 2008 WI App 152
supreme court decision; court of appeals decision; for Fischer: James M. Shellow, Robin Shellow, Urszula Tempska Note: federal habeas relief was subequently granted, Richard M. Fischer v. Ozaukee Co. Circ. Ct., ED Wis No. 10-C-553, 9/29/10. Federal appellate and district court cases don’t bind Wisconsin courts, which therefore needn’t follow this habeas decision, e.g., State v. Mechtel, […]
State v. John C. Berard, 2008AP 3187-CR, Dist II, 2/3/10
court of appeals decision (not recommended for publication); Resp Br. (Berard); Reply (State) Counsel – Conflict of Interest – Prior Representation in Unrelated Case “Berard’s postconviction showing that Peter B. was Attorney Smith’s former client in an unrelated case and that he wanted to pin his charged crimes on Peter B. does not equate to a showing […]
Closing Argument: Prosecutorial Misconduct – Interest-of-Justice Review
State v. Clifford D. Bvocik, 2010 WI App 49; for Bvocik: James C. Murray Prosecutorial Misconduct – Closing Argument Improper prosecutorial closing argument—encouraging jury to draw false inference—requires new trial in interest of justice; State v. Robert H. Weiss, Jr., 2008 WI App 72, controlling: ¶1 State v. Weiss, 2008 WI App 72, ¶¶15-17, 312 Wis. […]
State v. Bradley A. Krahn, 2009AP2406-CR, Dist II 2/3/10
court of appeals decision (not for publication); BiC; Resp Br; Reply Transport in Squad Didn’t Convert Stop to Arrest Temporary detention for OWI not converted to arrest by transport, in squad while handcuffed, to police station where field sobriety tests could be performed safely; court notes that officer expressly told Krahn detention was temporary and that handcuffs and […]
State v. Marvin L. Beauchamp, 2010 WI App 42
court of appeals decision, affirmed, 2011 WI 27; for Beauchamp: Martin E. Kohler, Craig S. Powell; case activity Dying Declaration, § 908.045(3) ¶8 … dying declaration, codified in Wisconsin Stat. Rule 908.045(3): “A statement made by a declarant while believing that the declarant’s death was imminent, concerning the cause or circumstances of […]
On Point is sponsored by Wisconsin State Public Defenders. All content is subject to public disclosure. Comments are moderated. If you have questions about this blog, please email [email protected].
On Point provides information (not legal advice) about important developments in the law. Please note that this information may not be up to date. Viewing this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with the Wisconsin State Public Defender. Readers should consult an attorney for their legal needs.