Explore in-depth analysis

On Point is a judicial analysis blog written by members of the Wisconsin State Public Defenders. It includes cases from the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Supreme Court of Wisconsin, and the Supreme Court of the United States.

Appellate Procedure – Standard of Review – Search & Seizure (pre-2010 Caselaw)

Go: here.

Appellate Procedure – Standard of Review – Sentencing (pre-2010 Caselaw)

Go: here.

Appellate Procedure – Standard of Review – Confessions (pre-2010 Caselaw)

Go: here; and here.

Appellate Procedure – Standard of Review – Speedy Trial (pre-2010 Caselaw)

Go: here.

Appellate Procedure – Standard of Review – Venue (pre-2010 Caselaw)

Go: here.

Appellate Procedure – Standard of Review – TPR (pre-2010 Caselaw)

Go: here.

S.C. Johnson v. Milton E. Morris, 2010 WI App 6, PFR filed

court of appeals decision Inadequate Appendix to Appellate Brief ¶5 n. 1:  We note that neither Russell’s nor Buske’s appellate counsel properly cite to the record. Record cites are often missing. An appellate court is improperly burdened where briefs fail to consistently and accurately cite to the record. Meyer v. Fronimades, 2 Wis. 2d 89, 93-94, 86 N.W.2d […]

Michelle Williams v. Housing Authority of the City of Milwaukee, 2010 WI App 14

court of appeals decision Appellate Standard of Review, Certiorari ¶9        When we review an application for a writ of certiorari, we review the agency’s decision, not the decision of the circuit court.  Kraus v. City of Waukesha Police & Fire Comm’n, 2003 WI 51, ¶10, 261 Wis. 2d 485, 662 N.W.2d 294.  The scope of certiorari review is limited […]

Jennifer M. v. Franz Maurer, 2010 WI App 8

court of appeals decision GAL Interview of Ward outside Presence of Adversary Counsel ¶11      The policies underlying the no-contact rule are of sufficient importance in guardianship cases that the right to counsel guaranteed by Wis. Stat. § 54.42(1)(b) includes the ward’s right to have counsel present during an interview with the guardian ad litem for the […]

State v. Sameeh J. Pickens, 2010 WI App 5, reconsideration denied

court of appeals decision; for Pickens: Eileen A. Hirsch, SPD, Madison Appellate Reasonable Suspicion for Detention and “Collective Knowledge” Doctrine Although, “under the collective knowledge doctrine, an investigating officer with knowledge of facts amounting to reasonable suspicion may direct a second officer without such knowledge to stop and detain a suspect,” the state must prove those […]

On Point is sponsored by Wisconsin State Public Defenders. All content is subject to public disclosure. Comments are moderated. If you have questions about this blog, please email [email protected].

On Point provides information (not legal advice) about important developments in the law. Please note that this information may not be up to date. Viewing this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with the Wisconsin State Public Defender. Readers should consult an attorney for their legal needs.