Explore in-depth analysis

On Point is a judicial analysis blog written by members of the Wisconsin State Public Defenders. It includes cases from the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Supreme Court of Wisconsin, and the Supreme Court of the United States.

Appellate Procedure – Standard of Review – Restitution (pre-2010 Caselaw)

Go: here.

Read full article >

Appellate Procedure – Standard of Review – Supreme Court Rule (pre-2010 Caselaw)

Go: here.

Read full article >

Appellate Procedure – Standard of Review – Search & Seizure (pre-2010 Caselaw)

Go: here.

Read full article >

Appellate Procedure – Standard of Review – Sentencing (pre-2010 Caselaw)

Go: here.

Read full article >

Appellate Procedure – Standard of Review – Confessions (pre-2010 Caselaw)

Go: here; and here.

Read full article >

Appellate Procedure – Standard of Review – Speedy Trial (pre-2010 Caselaw)

Go: here.

Read full article >

Appellate Procedure – Standard of Review – Venue (pre-2010 Caselaw)

Go: here.

Read full article >

Appellate Procedure – Standard of Review – TPR (pre-2010 Caselaw)

Go: here.

Read full article >

S.C. Johnson v. Milton E. Morris, 2010 WI App 6, PFR filed

court of appeals decision

Inadequate Appendix to Appellate Brief
¶5 n. 1:

 We note that neither Russell’s nor Buske’s appellate counsel properly cite to the record. Record cites are often missing. An appellate court is improperly burdened where briefs fail to consistently and accurately cite to the record. Meyer v. Fronimades, 2 Wis. 2d 89, 93-94, 86 N.W.2d 25 (1957). Even more troubling is that both appellate counsel failed to include in the appendix all “the findings or opinion[s] of the circuit court … including oral or written rulings or decisions showing the circuit court’s reasoning regarding those issues,” as required by Wis.

Read full article >

Michelle Williams v. Housing Authority of the City of Milwaukee, 2010 WI App 14

court of appeals decision

Appellate Standard of Review, Certiorari

¶9        When we review an application for a writ of certiorari, we review the agency’s decision, not the decision of the circuit court.  Kraus v. City of Waukesha Police & Fire Comm’n, 2003 WI 51, ¶10, 261 Wis. 2d 485, 662 N.W.2d 294.  The scope of certiorari review is limited to whether the Housing Authority:  (1) kept within its jurisdiction;

Read full article >

On Point is sponsored by Wisconsin State Public Defenders. All content is subject to public disclosure. Comments are moderated. If you have questions about this blog, please email [email protected].

On Point provides information (not legal advice) about important developments in the law. Please note that this information may not be up to date. Viewing this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with the Wisconsin State Public Defender. Readers should consult an attorney for their legal needs.