Explore in-depth analysis
On Point is a judicial analysis blog written by members of the Wisconsin State Public Defenders. It includes cases from the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Supreme Court of Wisconsin, and the Supreme Court of the United States.
Important posts
Ahead in SCOW
Sign up
Intrastate Detainer, § 971.11 — Self-Effectuating / Personal Nature of Request
State v. Michael D. Lewis, 2004 WI App 211 For Lewis: Timothy A. Provis Issue/Holding: ¶10. The State does not dispute that it failed to bring Lewis’s case to trial within 120 days after the district attorney’s office received his request for prompt disposition of his case. … ¶11. The statute mandates that when the […]
§ 903.03, Presumed Delivery of Mail
State v. Henry W. Aufderhaar, 2004 WI App 208, PFR filed 11/16/04 For Aufderhaar: J. Paul Neumeier Jr.; Raymond E. Krek Issue/Holding: ¶27 Here, it is true that the delinquency petition, though filed in court, was never in Aufderhaar’s hands before the waiver hearing took place. However, at the time of the hearing, Aufderhaar is […]
§ 904.01, Relevance – Consciousness of Innocence — Polygraph Test Offer, Made by Counsel
State v. Gregg A. Pfaff, 2004 WI App 31 For Pfaff: Rex Anderegg Issue/Holding: ¶26. While a polygraph test result is inadmissible in Wisconsin, see State v. Dean, 103 Wis. 2d 228, 279, 307 N.W.2d 628 (1981), an offer to take a polygraph test is relevant to an assessment of the offeror’s credibility and may […]
§ 904.03, Balancing Test – Richard A.P. Evidence
State v. Steven G. Walters, 2004 WI 18, reversing 2003 WI App 24 For Walters: David A. Danz Issue/Holding: ¶16. … The term “Richard A.P. evidence” comes from a decision of the court of appeals in which a defendant accused of molesting a child sought to introduce character evidence through the testimony of a psychologist. State v. Richard A.P., […]
§ 904.03, Unfair Prejudice – Autopsy Photo
State v. Gregg A. Pfaff, 2004 WI App 31 For Pfaff: Rex Anderegg Issue/Holding: ¶34. Whether photographs are to be admitted is a matter within the trial court’s discretion. State v. Lindvig, 205 Wis. 2d 100, 108, 555 N.W.2d 197 (Ct. App. 1996). We will not disturb the court’s discretionary decision “unless it is wholly unreasonable […]
§ 904.04, Construction — General
State v. Gregory J. Franklin, 2004 WI 38, affirming unpublished decision of court of appeals For Franklin: Patrick M. Donnelly, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue/Holding: ¶11. Wisconsin Stat. § 904.04(2) evidence may be offered in a criminal trial or a civil suit. State v. Sullivan, 216 Wis. 2d 768, 783, 576 N.W.2d 30 (1998) and Daniel B. Blinka, Evidence of Character, Habit and […]
§ 904.04 – Admissibility of Misconduct Evidence Despite Prior Acquittal
State v. David Arredondo, 2004 WI App 7, PFR filed 1/22/04 For Arredondo: James A. Rebholz Issue/Holding: Prior acquittal of sexual assault didn’t prevent admissibility of testimony from that trial: the test is whether a reasonable jury could find by preponderance of the evidence that the defendant committed the misconduct, State v. Landrum, 191 Wis. 2d 107, 117, […]
Plea Bargains – Validity: Reopen and Amend to Less Serious Offense if Restitution Made Before Sentencing
State v. Peter R. Cash, 2004 WI App 63 For Cash: Lynn M. Bureta Issue: Whether a plea agreement, which provided that if Cash returned stolen goods prior to sentencing the State would request that the judgment be reopened and amended from burglary to Class E felony theft, was invalid and the guilty plea therefore […]
Plea Bargains — Validity: Remedy for Invalid Plea Bargain
State v. Anthony L. Dawson, 2004 WI App 173 For Dawson: William E. Schmaal, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue/Holding: ¶25. In sum, the State has not presented us with a valid rationale for upholding the denial of Dawson’s plea withdrawal motion. Dawson has established that his plea was not knowing and voluntary because it was induced […]
Plea Bargains — Validity: Reopen and Amend to Less Serious Offense Upon Successful Completion of Probation
State v. Anthony L. Dawson, 2004 WI App 173 For Dawson: William E. Schmaal, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue: Whether a plea bargain under which the State agrees to subsequently reopen the case and amend it to a lesser charge is legally unenforceable and, thus, renders the plea unknowing and involuntary. Holding: A reopen-and-amend provision in […]
On Point is sponsored by Wisconsin State Public Defenders. All content is subject to public disclosure. Comments are moderated. If you have questions about this blog, please email [email protected].
On Point provides information (not legal advice) about important developments in the law. Please note that this information may not be up to date. Viewing this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with the Wisconsin State Public Defender. Readers should consult an attorney for their legal needs.