Explore in-depth analysis

On Point is a judicial analysis blog written by members of the Wisconsin State Public Defenders. It includes cases from the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Supreme Court of Wisconsin, and the Supreme Court of the United States.

§ 940.03, Felony Murder — Causation — PTAC

Lavelle Chambers v. McCaughtry, 264 F.3d 732 (7th Cir 2001) For Chambers: John T. Wasielewski Issue/Holding: Chambers is liable for the killing of a police officer by Chambers’ codefendant, while the pair were trying to flee apprehension during commission of a felony (armed burglary).

Read full article >

§ 940.11(2), Hiding Corpse — Sufficiency of Evidence

State v. Scott Leason Badker, 2001 WI App 27, 240 Wis. 2d 460, 623 N.W.2d 142 For Badker: Timothy A. Provis Issue: Whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain conviction for “hiding” corpse, § 940.11(2). Holding: By dumping the deceased’s body into a 6-foot-deep, water-lined ditch in a secluded wildlife refuge, Badker satisfied the element of “hiding” […]

Read full article >

§ 940.203(2), Battery — Threat to Judge

State v. Murle E. Perkins, 2000 WI App 137, 237 Wis. 2d 313, 614 N.W.2d 25, reversed on other grounds, State v. Perkins, 2001 WI 46, ¶2 n. 2 For Perkins: William E. Schmaal, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue: Whether a conditional threat to shoot a judge, made by a drunk and very depressed individual just before being taken […]

Read full article >

§ 941.29, Felon in Possession of Firearm – “Handling” = Element of “Possesses”

State v. Tyren E. Black, 2001 WI 31, 242 Wis. 2d 126, 624 N.W.2d 363 For Black: Michael S. Holzman Issue: Whether the defendant’s admission of “handling” a gun established the element of “possesses” a firearm under § 941.29(2), for purposes of establishing a guilty plea factual basis. Holding: ¶19 At the outset, we note […]

Read full article >

Exigency — Hot Pursuit — Entry of Residence — Arrest of 3rd Party

State v. Michael J. Kryzaniak/Sherry L. Kryzaniak, 2001 WI App 44 For Kryzaniak: Raymond G. Meyer II Issue: Whether warrantless entry of a residence to arrest a third party was justified by the exigent circumstance of hot pursuit. Holding: ¶18 … (T)here was no immediate or continuous pursuit of a suspect from the scene of […]

Read full article >

Exigency — Destruction of Evidence (Drugs) — Entry of Residence

State v. Edward Garrett, 2001 WI App 240, PFR filed For Garrett: Michael P. Sessa Issue: Whether warrantless entry of defendant’s apartment was justified under the exigent circumstances doctrine (risk that evidence — drugs — will be destroyed). Holding: Warrantless entry of a residence may be justified where both probable cause and exigent circumstances are shown. Probable […]

Read full article >

Exigent Circumstances – Destruction of Evidence (Drugs) — Entry of Residence

State v. Daniel Rodriguez, 2001 WI App 206, PFR filed 9/19/01 For Rodriguez: Diana Felsmann, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate Issue: Whether warrantless police entry of a residence was justified under the following circumstances: the location was a drug “hot spot”; before entry, undercover officers saw three people enter and quickly leave; drug arrests had been made at […]

Read full article >

§ 943.38, Forgery – Postal Money Order

State v. Eileen M. Entringer, 2001 WI App 157 For Entringer: William E. Schmaal, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue: Whether, for purposes of the forgery statute, a person can falsely make a postal order by writing in the name of someone else as the payer. Holding: Because forgery applies only to falsehoods that materially affect the […]

Read full article >

Double Jeopardy – Multiplicity: theft and concealment, §§ 943.20(1)(a) & (3)(d)5

State v. Jason J. Trawitzki, 2001 WI 77, 244 Wis. 2d 523, 628 N.W.2d 801, affirming State v. Trawitzki, 2000 WI App 205, 238 Wis. 2d 795, 618 N.W.2d 884 For Trawitzki: Donald T. Lang, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue: Whether multiple charges of theft of firearms taken at the same time, and multiple charges of concealing those […]

Read full article >

Community Caretaker — Juvenile in High-crime Area

State v. Kelsey C.R., 2001 WI 54 For Kelsey C. R.: Susan Alesia, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue: Whether, if a seizure did occur when the police told a potentially vulnerable juvenile girl in a high crime area to “stay put,” it was justified under the community caretaker doctrine. Holding: (Lead, three-vote opinion:) Given the “strong public interest […]

Read full article >

On Point is sponsored by Wisconsin State Public Defenders. All content is subject to public disclosure. Comments are moderated. If you have questions about this blog, please email [email protected].

On Point provides information (not legal advice) about important developments in the law. Please note that this information may not be up to date. Viewing this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with the Wisconsin State Public Defender. Readers should consult an attorney for their legal needs.