Explore in-depth analysis
On Point is a judicial analysis blog written by members of the Wisconsin State Public Defenders. It includes cases from the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Supreme Court of Wisconsin, and the Supreme Court of the United States.
Important posts
Ahead in SCOW
Sign up
Sentence After Revocation – Modification – Timeliness of Motion
State v. Joseph Scaccio III, 2000 WI App 265, 240 Wis.2d 95 For Scaccio: Jim D. Scott Issue: Whether Scaccio’s motion to modify a sentencing imposed after revocation was untimely because he failed to appeal the original judgment of conviction. Holding/Analysis: The principle is readily stated — you can take a direct appeal of a […]
Sentence Credit – Consecutive Sentences
State v. Thomas W. Jackson, 233 Wis.2d 231, 607 N.W.2d 338 (Ct. App. 2000) For Jackson: Martha K. Askins, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue: Whether a defendant is entitled to sentence credit on each consecutive sentence. Holding: Credit is allotted only toward the first of consecutive sentences. While on probation in Fond du Lac, Jackson was […]
Waiver of Issue: Dismissal Motion – Ruling Reserved Until After Defense Case
State v. Dennis E. Scott, 2000 WI App 51, 234 Wis. 2d 129, 608 N.W.2d 753 For Scott: Joseph E. Redding Issue: Whether right to review of a motion to dismiss at the close of the state’s case waived by failing to object to the trial court’s delay in ruling until after the defense presents […]
Restitution — Waiver of Objection
State v. David S. Leighton, 2000 WI App 156, 237 Wis.2d 709, 616 N.W.2d 126 For Leighton: Daniel Snyder Issue/Holding: ¶55 WISCONSIN STAT. § 973.20, governing restitution in criminal cases, “provides that a trial court ‘shall order the defendant to make full or partial restitution under this section to any victim of a crime,’ when […]
Restitution – Limitations – Delegation to DOC
State v. Aaron Evans, 2000 WI App 178, 238 Wis.2d 411, 617 N.W.2d 220 For Evans: Steven D. Phillips, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue: Whether the sentencing court may allow the department of corrections to determine the amount of restitution. Holding: Delegating determination of restitution to DOC isn’t authorized by statute and is therefore inappropriate: “Restitution […]
Restitution — Limitations — Time Limit
State v. Carl Simonetto, 2000 WI App 17, 232 Wis.2d 315, 606 N.W.2d 275 For Simonetto: Christopher L. Hartley Issue: Whether the trial court erred in holding open restitution until certain victims could be identified. Holding: “Section 973.20(13)(c), Stats., creates a ninety-day maximum hold-open period for entry of restitution after a sentence is imposed.” ¶10. (Note: […]
Restitution — Defenses — Contributory Negligence
State v. Chad J. Knoll, 2000 WI App 135, 237 Wis.2d 384, 614 N.W.2d 20 Issue: Whether contributory negligence is a defense to restitution. Holding: ¶¶16, 17: Restitution is not a claim that is owned by an individual but a remedy of the State…. To allow a defendant who has already been convicted of a […]
Presentation & Preservation of Argument – Footnotes
State v. Miguel Angel Santana-Lopez, 2000 WI App 122, 237 Wis.2d 332, 613 N.W.2d 918 For Santana-Lopez: Rex Anderegg Issue/Holding: “We do not consider an argument mentioned only in a footnote to be adequately raised or preserved for appellate review,” ¶6 n.4. Interesting that the holding itself happens to be contained in a footnote.
Restitution — Causation — “Natural and Probable Consequence” of Crime — Damage Caused by Police While Defendant Resisted Arrest
State v. Freeman Canady, 2000 WI App 87, 234 Wis. 2d 261, 610 N.W.2d 147 For Canady: Charles B. Vetzner, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue: Whether a defendant, convicted of resisting arrest, can be ordered to pay restitution for damage caused by a police officer in the course of subduing him. Holding: Because the damage was […]
Review — Sentence After Revocation — Imposed by same Judge
State v. Brian C. Wegner, 2000 WI App 231, 239 Wis.2d 96, 619 N.W.2d 289 For Wegner: Scott A. Szabrowicz Issue: Whether the sentencing court erroneously exercised discretion, in sentencing after revocation, by failing to consider primary sentencing factors. Holding: ¶9 We conclude that when the same judge presides at the sentencing after revocation and […]
On Point is sponsored by Wisconsin State Public Defenders. All content is subject to public disclosure. Comments are moderated. If you have questions about this blog, please email [email protected].
On Point provides information (not legal advice) about important developments in the law. Please note that this information may not be up to date. Viewing this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with the Wisconsin State Public Defender. Readers should consult an attorney for their legal needs.