Explore in-depth analysis
On Point is a judicial analysis blog written by members of the Wisconsin State Public Defenders. It includes cases from the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Supreme Court of Wisconsin, and the Supreme Court of the United States.
Important posts
Ahead in SCOW
Sign up
Reasonable Suspicion – Frisk – Scope of Search
State v. Jose C. McGill, 2000 WI 38, 234 Wis. 2d 560, 609 N.W.2d 795, affirming unpublished decision For McGill: Steven P. Weiss, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue1: Whether seizing an object from the suspect’s pocket exceeded the permissible scope of a Terry frisk Holding: Because the object’s size, shape and feel were consistent with a pocket knife; and […]
Consecutive Sentences — Authority to Stay Sentence Until Release or Discharge on Ch. 980 Commitment
State v. David Carneal White, 2000 WI App 147, 237 Wis.2d 699, 615 N.W.2d 667 For White: Jeffrey A. Kingsley Issue: Whether a court has authority to stay a sentence until the defendant is released or discharged from an otherwise unrelated Ch. 980 commitment. Holding: The purposes of § 971.17 NGI and Ch. 980 SVP commitments being similar (¶¶8-9), […]
Warrants – Arrest Warrant as Authority to Enter of Third-Party Residence
State v. Antonion Blanco, Nora M. Al-Shammari, 2000 WI App 119, 237 Wis.2d 395, 614 N.W.2d 512 For Blanco: Michael P. Jakus Issue: Whether an arrest warrant provided authority for the police to enter the residence of a third party and arrest the person named in the warrant. Holding: ¶10 An arrest warrant authorizes the […]
Warrants – No-Knock Authorization – Sufficiency of Showing of Danger
State v. Rayshun D. Eason, 2000 WI App 73, 234 Wis. 2d 396, 610 N.W.2d 208, affirmed in pertinent part, but reversed on other grounds, 2001 WI 98, ¶¶21-26 For Eason (in SCt): Suzanne Hagopian, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue: Whether the no-knock warrant was supported by reasonable suspicion that announcing police presence would create danger. Holding: The showing […]
Warrants – Probable Cause – Drug Dealing Nexus to Dealer’s Residence
State v. Lance R. Ward, 2000 WI 3, 231 Wis.2d 723, 604 N.W.2d 517, reversing 222 Wis. 2d 311, 588 N.W.2d 645 For Ward: Daniel P. Dunn Issue: Whether the search warrant established probable cause despite the absence of an explicit connection between the owner’s alleged drug dealing and his residence. Holding: The supporting affidavit’s assertion that the […]
Warrants – Scope of Authorized Search
State v. Kenneth M. Herrmann, 2000 WI App 38, 233 Wis. 2d 135, 608 N.W.2d 406 For Herrmann: Peter J. Morin Issue: Whether officers executing a search warrant for Landis’s apartment exceeded the scope of the warrant when they entered and searched Herrmann’s separate residential unit on the same floor. Holding: The officers neither knew nor […]
Warrants – Scope of Authorized Search – Plain View – Computer Files
State v. Keith Schroeder, 2000 WI App 128, 237 Wis.2d 575, 613 N.W.2d 911 For Schroeder: Kevin D. Musolf Issue/Holding: Inspection of child pornography on a computer, found during a warrant-authorized search of a computer for unrelated material, was in plain view so as to be subject to seizure without a separate warrant: 13 In order […]
Warrants – Scope of Authorized Search
State v. James H. Oswald, 2000 WI App 3, 232 Wis.2d 103, 606 N.W.2d 238 For Oswald: James L. Fullin, Jr., SPD, Madison Appellate Issue: Whether a search of documents exceeded the scope of a warrant authorizing a search for currency, among other things. Holding: Because the warrant authorized a search for currency, the officers were […]
First Amendment – Overbreadth – Video Showing Nudity, § 944.205 (1999-2000)
State v. Scott L. Stevenson, 2000 WI 71, 236 Wis. 2d 86, 613 N.W.2d 72, on certification For Stevenson: Elizabeth Cavendish-Sosinski, Daniel P. Fay Issue: Whether § 944.205(2)(a) is overbroad. Holding: Yes. § 944.205(a) (a) prohibits depictions of nudity without the person’s knowledge and consent. Because this statute implicates first amendment rights, the state assumes the […]
Forfeiture — Vehicle Used in Crime — Proportionality Test
State v. William W. Boyd, 2000 WI App 208, 238 Wis.2d 693, 618 N.W.2d 251 Issue: Whether forfeiture of the entire value of a $28,000 vehicle which transported a weapon used in a crime was excessive, especially in light of the maximum fine of $10,000 for the crime. Holding: Applying the proportionality test mandated by United States […]
On Point is sponsored by Wisconsin State Public Defenders. All content is subject to public disclosure. Comments are moderated. If you have questions about this blog, please email [email protected].
On Point provides information (not legal advice) about important developments in the law. Please note that this information may not be up to date. Viewing this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with the Wisconsin State Public Defender. Readers should consult an attorney for their legal needs.