Explore in-depth analysis

On Point is a judicial analysis blog written by members of the Wisconsin State Public Defenders. It includes cases from the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Supreme Court of Wisconsin, and the Supreme Court of the United States.

§ 940.19(1), Battery – causing bodily harm, splashed with urine.

State v. Charles Dante Higgs, 230 Wis.2d 1, 601 N.W.2d 653 (Ct. App. 1999) For Higgs: Joseph E. Redding Issue: Whether splashing the victim’s face with urine satisfies the battery element of bodily harm. Holding: The mere fact that urine struck the victim’s face isn’t enough to establish bodily harm, but the victim’s testimony that he felt […]

Read full article >

Expectation of Privacy – Curtilage – Backyard area

State v. Michael Wilson, 229 Wis.2d 256, 600 N.W.2d 14 (Ct. App. 1999) For Wilson: Martha A. Askins, SPD, Madison Appellate. Issue/Holding: Officer’s invasion of home’s curtilage, where he smelled marijuana burning inside, held unlawful. Court enumerates various factors relevant to extent of curtilage protection, and stresses that fourth amendment protects both home and area around […]

Read full article >

Expectation of Privacy – Commercial Building Dumpster

State v. Richard D. Yakes, 226 Wis.2d 425, 595 N.W.2d 108 (Ct. App. 1999) Issue/Holding: Yakes owned a commercial enterprise, on whose property was a dumpster owned by the disposal company. The police, acting without a warrant, seized evidence from the dumpster. Yakes, the court of appeals holds, did not demonstrate a reasonable expectation of privacy […]

Read full article >

§ 943.23(1r), Carjacking: Operating Vehicle Without Owner’s Consent Resulting in Death — Sufficiency of Evidence, Causation

State v. Earl L. Miller, 231 Wis.2d 447, 605 N.W.2d 567 (Ct. App. 1999) For Miller: Eduardo M. Borda Issue: Whether an act may satisfy the “substantial factor” test for causation element if it merely plays a prominent rather than lone role in the proscribed result. Holding: Causation is satisfied by any significant, not necessarily […]

Read full article >

§ 943.32, Armed Robbery – sufficiency of evidence

State v. Keith Jones, 228 Wis.2d 593, 598 N.W.2d 259 (Ct. App. 1999) For Jones: Edward J. Hunt Holding: In the course of making their get-away, Jones’s shoplifting codefendant allegedly threatened Shogren, a pursuing guard. Notwithstanding the codefendant’s acquittal, Jones’s conviction for armed robbery is sustained against a sufficiency of evidence challenge. Here, there was […]

Read full article >

§ 943.10(2), Burglary While Armed – nexus of weapon to underlying crime

State v. David J. Gardner, 230 Wis. 2d 32, 601 N.W.2d 670 (Ct. App. 1999) For Gardner: Steven P. Weiss, SPD, Madison Appellate Holding: Gardner was convicted of burglary while armed, § 943.10(2), and argues that the crime requires a nexus of weapon to burglary. The argument fails, largely on authority of State v. Norris, […]

Read full article >

Bail jumping – sufficiency of evidence – no drug consumption, positive urine test.

State v. Louis Taylor, 226 Wis.2d 490, 595 N.W.2d 56 (Ct. App. 1999) For Taylor: Donald T. Lang, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue:  Whether a positive urine test, while the subject is under  is on bail with a no drug consumption bond condition, is sufficient to support a felony bail jumping conviction. Holding:/Analysis: “Where the State prosecutes […]

Read full article >

§ 948.02, Child Abuse — failing to protect child from sexual assault — elements — person responsible for child’s welfare.

State v. Suzette M. Ward, 228 Wis.2d 301, 596 N.W.2d 887 (Ct. App. 1999) For Ward: Patricia L. Arreazola Holding: The § 948.02(3) element, “person responsible for the welfare of a child,” was properly defined in jury instructions as “person employed or used by one legally responsible for the child’s welfare.” Payment, that is, isn’t […]

Read full article >

Arrest — Authority of Sheriff to Arrest in Municipality

State v. Rodney G. Zivcic, 229 Wis.2d 119, 598 N.W.2d 565 (Ct. App. 1999) For Zivcic: John J. Carter Issue/Holding: A sheriff’s deputy has authority to arrest in a city located in the county. Easy enough. Plus, there’s significant authority allowing a an officer to peform an out-of-jurisdiction arrest under a “citizen’s arrest” rationale: see State v. […]

Read full article >

§ 948.22(2), Nonsupport — “involuntary” payment via intercepts of tax refunds

State v. David J. Lenz, 230 Wis.2d 529, 602 N.W.2d 173 (Ct. App. 1999) For Lenz: Steven D. Phillips, SPD, Madison Appellate. Issue: Whether intercepts of tax refunds can be considered payments toward support obligations. Holding: The nonsupport statute doesn’t require that payments be made “voluntarily,” and tax refund intercepts therefore count. “The intercepts are […]

Read full article >

On Point is sponsored by Wisconsin State Public Defenders. All content is subject to public disclosure. Comments are moderated. If you have questions about this blog, please email [email protected].

On Point provides information (not legal advice) about important developments in the law. Please note that this information may not be up to date. Viewing this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with the Wisconsin State Public Defender. Readers should consult an attorney for their legal needs.