Explore in-depth analysis
On Point is a judicial analysis blog written by members of the Wisconsin State Public Defenders. It includes cases from the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Supreme Court of Wisconsin, and the Supreme Court of the United States.
Important posts
Ahead in SCOW
Sign up
Plea-Withdrawal – Pre-Sentence – Newly Discovered Evidence – Recantation
State v. Dennis J. Kivioja, 225 Wis.2d 271, 592 N.W.2d 220 (1999), on certification For Kivioja: Mark G. Sukowaty. Issue/Holding: Kivioja pleaded guilty after his codefendant, Stehle, implicated him in a string of burglaries. Following his own sentencing and prior to Kivioja’s, Stehle recanted and Kivioja moved to withdraw his pleas. The trial court denied […]
Plea-Withdrawal – Pre-sentence – Original Sentence Vacated
State v. Jonathan V. Manke, 230 Wis.2d 421, 602 N.W.2d 139 (Ct. App. 1999) For Manke: Waring R. Fincke Issue/Holding: After a plea-based sentence has been vacated, and re-sentencing ordered, the “fair and just reason” standard applies to a motion to withdraw the plea: Before considering if Manke met his burden of proof, our initial […]
Plea-Withdrawal – Pre-sentence – bias of PSI author
State v. Steven M. Shimek, 230 Wis.2d 730, 601 N.W.2d 865 (Ct. App. 1999) For Shimek: Keith A. Findley. Issue: Whether perceived bias on part of PSI author supports pre-sentence withdrawal of guilty plea. Holding: Trial court’s denial of motion, along with disregarding recommendation of that PSI and allowing defense to prepare alternative PSI, was […]
Plea-Withdrawal – Pre-sentence: Counsel’s Alleged Failure to Investigate Alibi
State v. Jonathan L. Franklin, 228 Wis.2d 408, 596 N.W.2d 855 (Ct. App. 1999) For Franklin: Archie E. Simonson. Holding: Franklin’s effort to withdraw his guilty plea, based on a claim that his attorney failed to investigate an alibi, is rebuffed. His attorney testified at a plea-withdrawal hearing that Franklin had already admitted that the […]
Guilty Pleas – Post-Sentencing Plea Withdrawal: Discovery of Exculpatory Evidence
State v. Michael R. Sturgeon, 231 Wis.2d 487, 605 N.W.2d 589 (Ct. App. 1999) For Sturgeon: Terry Evan Williams. Issue/Holding: To prevail on a motion to withdraw guilty plea based on postplea discovery of exculpatory information, a defendant must prove (a) the existence of exculpatory evidence (b) in the exclusive control of the prosecution (c) […]
§ 901.03, Objection/Offer of Proof – sufficiency – cite to applicable caselaw
State v. David C. Tutlewski, 231 Wis.2d 379, 605 N.W.2d 561 (Ct. App. 1999) For Tutlewski: Dianne M. Erickson Issue: Whether citation to relevant authority preserved an evidentiary objection. Holding: The issue was preserved by contemporaneous objection that included citation to relevant caselaw: ¶10 At trial and before Carver was permitted to testify, Tutlewski renewed […]
Offer of Proof — Involuntary Intoxication — Need to Distinguish Right from Wrong
State v. David J. Gardner, 230 Wis. 2d 32, 601 N.W.2d 670 (Ct. App. 1999) For Gardner: Steven P. Weiss, SPD, Madison Appellate Holding: Gardner attempted to raise an involuntary intoxication defense, § 939.42(1), based on the effects of prescription medication. The trial court heard his offer of proof and barred his expert (psychiatrist) from […]
§ 901.07, Completeness Doctrine — Trumping Hearsay Rule
State v. Gordon R. Anderson, Jr., 230 Wis.2d 121, 600 N.W.2d 913 (Ct. App. 1999) For Anderson: Craig M. Kuhary Issue: Whether the trial court erred, under the doctrine of completeness, in refusing to admit certain portions of Anderson’s statement to a detective. Holding: The completeness doctrine trumps the hearsay rule, and the trial court […]
Relevance, § 904.01 – Association with Drug-involved Individual — Association with Motorcycle Gang
State v. Liliana Petrovic, 224 Wis.2d 477, 592 N.W.2d 238 (Ct. App. 1999). For Petrovic: Robert B. Rondini Issue/Holding: The court holds admissible the following evidence: defendant’s “close” connection to someone (Fooden) with whom an agent “was familiar … based on drug investigations he had performed for the IRS.” “The State’s evidence indicating a connection […]
§ 904.01, Relevance – Consciousness of Guilt — Flight Three Days After Crime
State v. Earl L. Miller, 231 Wis.2d 447, 605 N.W.2d 567 (Ct. App. 1999) For Miller: Eduardo M. Borda Issue: Whether evidence of the defendant’s flight from police three days after the crime was admissible. Holding: “While not part of the original criminal episode, evidence of flight was admissible because it indicated Miller’s consciousness of […]
On Point is sponsored by Wisconsin State Public Defenders. All content is subject to public disclosure. Comments are moderated. If you have questions about this blog, please email [email protected].
On Point provides information (not legal advice) about important developments in the law. Please note that this information may not be up to date. Viewing this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with the Wisconsin State Public Defender. Readers should consult an attorney for their legal needs.