On Point blog, page 35 of 49
Juror Bias – Assessment, Generally / Child Sexual Assault
State v. David D. Funk, 2011 WI 62, reversing unpublished summary disposition; for Funk: Michele Anne Tjader; case activity
Juror Bias – Assessment, Generally
A claim of juror bias relies requires proof of the two-step test articulated by State v. Wyss, 124 Wis. 2d 681, 726, 370 N.W.2d 745 (1985): “(1) that the juror incorrectly or incompletely responded to a material question on voir dire;
Petition for (NGI) Conditional Release, § 971.17(2) (1987-88): Dangerousness, Review
State v. Alan Adin Randall, 2011 WI App 102 (recommended for publication); for Randall: Brian Kinstler, Craig S. Powell; case activity; prior history: State v. Randall, 192 Wis. 2d 800, 532 N.W.2d 94 (1995) (“Randall I”); State v. Randall, 222 Wis. 2d 53, 586 N.W.2d 318 (Ct.
State v. David W. Stevens, 2009AP2057-CR, review granted 5/24/11
on petition for review of unpublished decision; for Stevens: Paul G. LaZotte, SPD, Madison Appellate; case activity
Issues (provided by court):
If a suspect in custody initiates communication with the police after previously invoking his Miranda right to consult with an attorney but has yet to again waive his Miranda rights, do the police violate the demands of Miranda by denying an attorney access to the suspect prior to the second waiver of his Miranda rights?
TPR – “Bonding Expert”; Dispositional Phase Adjournment
State v. Henry W., 2011AP693, District 1, 6/7/11
court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Henry W.: Jane S. Earle; case activity
Testimony of a “bonding expert” as to how the child’s view of her father would make it difficult for him to meet conditions of return, was relevant and admissible in the grounds phase, ¶¶5-7, 10.
Trial court’s refusal to grant adjournment of dispositional phase so that father could secure his own bonding expert,
Luis M. Narvaez v. U.S., 7th Cir No. 09-2919, 6/3/11
7th circuit court of appeals decision
Retroactive Application of Case Law, on Collateral Review
Narvaez’s federal ACCA enhancement, imposed in 2003, is now unsupportable in light of subsequently-decided Supreme Court authority (Begay v. U.S.; Chambers v. U.S.). He may therefore seek relief against the sentencing enhancement via 28 U.S.C. § 2255: the case law development worked a change in “substantive liability”
Entitlement to Machner Hearing
State v. Jimmie C. Grayer, 2010AP1749-CR, District 1, 6/1/11
court of appeals decision (not recommended for publication); for Grayer: Bridget E. Boyle; case activity
Postconviction denial of ineffective assistance of counsel challenge without Machner hearing upheld.
1. Although counsel performed deficiently by inaccurately telling the jury in his opening statement that Grayer’s in-custody had not been recorded by the police, Grayer wasn’t prejudiced by the deficiency.
Sentencing – Discretion
State v. Dustin M. Przybylski, 2011AP1-CR, District 2, 6/1/11
court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Przybylski: Michael S. Holzman; case activity
OWI sentence consecutive to unrelated 15-year sentence upheld, despite joint recommendations of concurrent time, against argument it was fashioned mechanistically rather than as exercise of discretion, State v. Martin, 100 Wis. 2d 326, 302 N.W.2d 58 (Ct. App.
Newly Discovered Evidence; In Camera Inspection, Psychological Treatment Records; Evidence – Restriction on Expert Testimony
State v. Crystal P. Keith, 2010AP1667-CR, District 1, 5/24/11
court of appeals decision (not recommended for publication); for Keith: John A. Pray; case activity
On Keith’s conviction for reckless homicide in beating death of foster son, statements of her biological daughter (such as, “Why does mama have to go to jail for what my daddy did”) didn’t satisfy the test for newly discovered evidence. Keith’s confession to the police “was so detailed”
Guest Post: Forbush and the Riddle of a Fragmented Court
On Point is very pleased to publish this guest post by Attorney Michael B. Brennan, currently practicing with Gass Weber Mullins LLC, and formerly a Milwaukee County Circuit Court judge. Mr. Brennan offers his thoughts on the fractured decision of the supreme court in State v. Forbush, 2011 WI 25. On Point invites readers to submit comments to this post, in the box below.
As Dean Kearney pointed out in an interesting speech he gave to the Western District of Wisconsin bar association,
Reasonable Suspicion, Terry Stop: High-Crime Area, Ski Mask, et al.; Appellate Procedure: State’s Waiver of Argument
State v. Deshon C. Matthews, 2011 WI App 92 (recommended for publication); for Matthews: Paul G. Bonneson; case activity
Terry Stop – Reasonable Suspicion
Reasonable suspicion supported stop of Matthews, when police on patrol saw him wearing a ski mask and hoodie late at night in a high-crime area near a woman who was walking away form him and who appeared to be frightened.