On Point blog, page 9 of 19
Search and seizure – order for real-time cell phone location tracking
State v. Bobby L. Tate, 2012AP336-CR, District 1, 12/27/12; court of appeals decision (not recommended for publication), petition for review granted 6/12/13; case activity
Order allowing police to track the current location of cell phone upheld, rejecting Tate’s argument that it constituted an illegal search warrant:
¶8 The heart of Tate’s argument on appeal is that the order authorizing the tracking of Tate’s phone to find its location was invalid under Wis.
Probable Cause – PBT, § 343.303; Blood Test Admissibility; Probable Cause – PBT, § 343.303
Winnebago County v. Anastasia G. Christenson, 2012AP1189, District 2, 10/31/12
court of appeals decision (1-judge, ineligible for publication); case activity
Probable Cause – PBT, § 343.303
¶11 At the time Putzer administered the PBT to Christenson, he was aware that she had driven her car into a ditch, smelled of “intoxicating beverages” around midnight on Saturday night/Sunday morning (a day and time that increases suspicion of alcohol consumption),
Reasonable Suspicion, Probable Cause – OWI
court of appeals decision (1-judge, ineligible for publication); case activity
State v. Andrew Wheaton, 2012AP173-CR
Reasonable Suspicion – OWI
Presence of the following factors establish reasonable suspicion to stop Wheaton for impaired driving:
¶23 The State points to the following as factors that produced an objectively reasonable suspicion of impaired driving at the time of the stop: (1) Wheaton was driving at 3:05 a.m.,
Probation Search: PBT Administered by Police Officer
State v. Marilee F. Devries, 2012 WI App 119 (recommended for publication); case activity
Devries’ probation agent, after detecting alcohol on her breath during a visit at the probation office, had a law enforcement officer administer a preliminary breath test. One thing led to another and she was convicted of OWI. She challenges the PBT as a police, rather than probation, search because the probation officer wasn’t involved in the test,
Traffic Stop – Inattentive Driving
State v. Timothy W. Bastian, 2012AP793-CR, District 3, 9/25/12
court of appeals decision (1-judge, ineligible for publication); case activity
The court holds, without resolving the issue of whether reasonable suspicion sufficed, that probable cause supported Bastian’s traffic stop for inattentive driving, given “the circuit court’s factual determination that Bastian was ‘looking towards the passenger seat’”:
¶10 Wisconsin Stat. § 346.89, titled “Inattentive driving,” provides in relevant part: “No person while driving a motor vehicle shall be so engaged or occupied as to interfere with the safe driving of such vehicle.” Wis.
Arrest – Probable Cause – Traffic Violation
State v. Portia M. Meyer, 2012AP206-CR, District 4, 9/20/12
court of appeals decision (1-judge, ineligible for publication); case activity
Assuming that the police placed Meyer under arrest when handcuffing her and placing her in the back of a squad car following a traffic accident, they had probable cause to do so for failure to yield right-of-way:
¶8 Police may arrest a person without a warrant for “the violation of a traffic regulation if the traffic officer has reasonable grounds to believe that the person is violating or has violated a traffic regulation.”[2] Wis.
Search & Seizure: PBT Probable Cause; PBT Evidence: Admissibility without DOT Certification
State v. Christopher J. Felton, 2012 WI App 114 (recommended for publication); case activity
Search & Seizure – PBT – Probable Cause
Notwithstanding that Felton passed field sobriety tests, probable cause existed to administer a preliminary breath test.
¶8 This section does not require that the officer have probable cause to arrest a driver for drunk driving before giving that driver a preliminary-breath test.
Search Warrant – Erroneous Information in Application; Search Warrant – No-Knock Authorization
State v. Nick E. Sammon, District 2, 2011AP682-CR, 7/25/12
court of appeals decision (not recommended for publication); case activity
Search Warrant – Erroneous Information in Application
A detective’s application for a search warrant of Sammons’ residence asserted that Sammons had been convicted in Texas for drug and burglary offenses (in fact, both had been dismissed after deferred adjudication of guilt). The assertions in the warrant application were based on the NCIC database,
Arrest – Probable Cause
State v. Matthew Owen Hoff, Jr., 2011AP2096-CR, District 3, 6/26/12
court of appeals decision (1-judge, ineligible for publication); case activity
¶19 Here, before arresting Hoff, Gostovich observed him sleeping behind the wheel of a running car that was parked horizontally against the vertical parking stalls. Hoff did not awake to Gostovich’s shouting or knocking. When he finally awoke, he was disorientated and confused, and that disorientation “did not dissipate.” Hoff’s speech was slowed,
Chunon L. Bailey v. U.S., USSC No. 11-770, cert granted 6/4/12
Question Presented (from cert petition):
Whether, pursuant to Michigan v. Summers, 452 U.S. 692 (1981), police officers may detain an individual incident to the execution of a search warrant when the individual has left the immediate vicinity of the premises before the warrant is executed.
Lower court decision (652 F.3d 197 2nd Cir 2011)
Police getting ready to execute a search warrant saw Bailey leave the residence,