Explore in-depth analysis

On Point is a judicial analysis blog written by members of the Wisconsin State Public Defenders. It includes cases from the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Supreme Court of Wisconsin, and the Supreme Court of the United States.

TPR – Grounds: “Reasonable Effort” Obligation of Responsible Agency, § 48.415(2)(a)2b

State v. Elbert H., 2012AP446 / State v. Stacee P., 2012AP169, District 1, 6/12/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, ineligible for publication); for Elbert H.: Devon M. Lee, SPD, Madison Appellate; case activity; for Stacee P.: Gregory Bates; case activity The relevant agency’s responsibility to make a reasonable effort to provide court-ordered services encompasses post-petition activity: […]

State ex rel. Office of State Public Defender v. Wis. Court of Appeals, 2012AP544-W, rev. granted 6/13/12

on review of petition for supervisory writ; for SPD: Joseph N. Ehmann, Kathleen A. Pakes; case activity Postconviction Reference to PSI  Issue (Composed by On Point):  Whether, before litigating a presentence report-related sentencing issue, postconviction counsel must obtain circuit court permission to “access, discuss, cite to, and quote from a PSI report.” Fall-out from State v. Parent, 2006 […]

State v. Leilani E. Neumann, 2011AP1105-CR / State v. Dale R. Neumann, 2011AP1044-CR, rev. granted 6/13/12

on review of certification request; for Leilani Neumann: Byron C. Lichstein; case activity; for Dale Neumann: Stephen L. Miller; case activity Reckless Homicide and “Faith Healing” as Substitute for Medical Treatment  Issues (Composed by On Point):  1. Whether the “faith healing” defense in § 948.03(6) is limited to prosecutions for child abuse or extends to reckless homicide, § 940.06(1). 2. […]

State v. Brent T. Novy, 2012 WI App 10, petition for review granted 6/13/12

on review of published decision; for Novy: Bridget E. Boyle; case activity Rebuttal – Evidence Excluded from Case-in-Chief for Discovery Violation / Sleeping Juror  Issues (Composed by On Point) caution: issue-identification necessarily speculative; check case activity link after briefs filed for verification of issues:  1. a) Whether evidence ruled inadmissible during the State’s case-in-chief as a sanction for violating […]

State v. Kenneth M. Sobczak, 2012 WI App 6, petition for review granted 6/13/12

on review of published decision; for: Sobczak: Andrew Hinckel, SPD, Madison Appellate; case activity Third-Party Consent  Issues (Composed by On Point):  Whether Sobczak’s girlfriend, a non-resident guest in his parents’ home, had authority to consent to police entry into the home and to search and seizure of Sobczak’s laptop. A mere guest ordinarily may not consent to a […]

Appellate Procedure: Waived Objection to Jury Instruction; Inaccuracy in Witness’s Accurate Criminal Record: Harmless Error; Defendant’s Right Not to Testify: Retrospective Hearing – State Satisfied Burden of Proof

State v. Joel Joseph Lobermeier, 2012 WI App 77 (recommended for publication); for Lobermeier: Andrea Taylor Cornwall, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate; case activity Appellate Procedure – Waiver – Jury Instructions  Failure to object to a jury instruction amounts to a failure to preserve for review an asserted objection, which must therefore be reviewed in the context […]

Felon-in-Possession, § 941.29 – Constitutionality

State v. Daniel Lee Rueden, Jr., 2011AP001034-CR, District 4, 6/7/12 court of appeals decision (not recommended for publication); for Rueden: Eileen A. Hirsch, Kaitlin A. Lamb, SPD; case activity Felon-in-possession, § 941.29, is not unconstitutional either facially or as applied in this instance; State v. Pocian, 2012 WI App 58, deemed controlling. ¶6        We need not discuss the specifics of […]

Appellate Jurisdiction

State v. Alexander Velazquez-Perez, 2010AP001128-CR, District 1/4, 6/7/12 court of appeals decision (not recommended for publication); for Velazquez-Perez: David Leeper; case activity The court of appeals has authority to extend the deadline for filing a postconviction motion; Velazquez-Perez filed his motion within the deadline as extended by the court of appeals, and jurisdiction attached over appeal of […]

Competence of Court – Guardianship

MaryBeth Lipp v. Outagamie County Dept. of Health and Human Services, 2011AP152, District 3, 6/5/12 court of appeals decision (not recommended for publication); case activity Failure to decide a guardianship petition within the statutorily mandated 90 days of filing (§ 54.44(1)) caused the trial court to lose competency to proceed. Lack of objection didn’t waive […]

Ineffective Assistance of Reconfinement Counsel: Duty to Correct Misleading DOC Summary

State v. Wayne P. Harris, 2012 wI App 79(recommended for publication); for Harris:  Attorney Gary Grass; case activity We know that “[a] defendant has a due process right to be sentenced based on accurate information.”  See State v. Tiepelman, 2006 WI 66, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d 179, 717 N.W.2d 1  But what happens when the sentencing court relies […]

On Point is sponsored by Wisconsin State Public Defenders. All content is subject to public disclosure. Comments are moderated. If you have questions about this blog, please email [email protected].

On Point provides information (not legal advice) about important developments in the law. Please note that this information may not be up to date. Viewing this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with the Wisconsin State Public Defender. Readers should consult an attorney for their legal needs.