Explore in-depth analysis

On Point is a judicial analysis blog written by members of the Wisconsin State Public Defenders. It includes cases from the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Supreme Court of Wisconsin, and the Supreme Court of the United States.

Stephen Toliver v. McCaughtry, E.D. Wis. No. 02-C-1123

district court decision, granting habeas relief on review of unpublished Wis COA opinion (2000AP-2460-CR); on remand from Toliver v. McCaughtry, 539 F.3d 766 (7th Cir.2008)  for Toliver: Brian P. Mullins; Toliver BiC; Wis. Resp.; Reply Habeas – Ineffective Assistance – Deficient Performance Counsel performed deficiently in failing to call two potential witnesses who would have […]

Chs. 51 / 55 – Placement at Mendota

Rock County v. Donald G., 2010AP2444, District 4, 2/17/11 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Donald G.: Steven D. Grunder, SPD, Madson Appellate; case activity Concededly proper placement at Mendota under concurrent chs. 51 (mental health commitment) and 55 (protective placement) needn’t account for future termination should ch. 51 commitment later be […]

Court of Appeals Publication Orders, 2/11

court of appeals publication orders, 2/16/11 On Point posts from this list: 2011 WI App 21 State v. Basil E. Ryan, Jr. 2011 WI App 22 State v. Terry L. Kletzien, Jr. 2011 WI App 25 State v. Demetrius M. Boyd 2011 WI App 26 Heather B. v. Jennifer B.

Briefing – Nomenclature

Donna J. Murr v. St. Croix County Board of Adjustment, 2008AP2728, District 3, 2/15/11 court of appeals decision (recommended for publication); case activity ¶18 n. 11: The Board’s response brief repeatedly refers to Murr as plaintiff.  We remind counsel that references should be to names, not party designations.  See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.19(1)(i). Surpassingly minor […]

SVP – Petition for Discharge – Request for Independent Examiner, Hearing: Alleged Change of Diagnosis

State v. Kenneth R. Parrish, 2010AP809, District 1, 2/15/11 court of appeals decision (3-judge, not recommended for publication); for Parrish: Ellen Henak, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate; case activity; Parrish BiC; State Resp.; Reply SVP – Petition for Discharge – Request for Independent Examiner Parrish’s failure to unequivocally request appointment of an independent examiner dooms his argument […]

Stalking, § 940.32: Notice of Charge, “Course of Conduct” / Elevation from Class I to H Felony Status

State v. Janet A. Conner, 2011 WI 8, affirming 2009 WI App 143; for Conner: Stephen E. Mays; case activity; Conner BiC; State Resp.; Reply Stalking, § 940.32 – Notice of Charge, “Course of Conduct” Stalking requires proof of, among other elements, a “course of conduct” which “means a series of 2 or more acts carried out […]

TPR – Condition of Return; Best Interests Analysis

State v. Abigail W., 2010AP2792, District 1, 2/10/11 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Abigail W.: Jeffrey W. Jensen; case activity TPR – Condition of Return CHIPS condition that parent “show that you can care for and supervise your child properly and that you understand [her] special needs” wasn’t an impossible condition but, rather, was […]

Counsel Sanctions: Violation of No-Cite Rule

Shirley Anderson v. Northwood School District, 2011 WI App 31; case activity ¶7 n. 3: Northwood cites a circuit court decision from another case as persuasive authority, correctly noting that such a citation does not violate WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3), which prohibits citing unpublished appellate cases decided before July 1, 2009.  However, Northwood then emphasizes we affirmed the […]

State v. Sharon A. Sellhausen, 2010 WI App 175, review granted 2/8/11

court of appeals decision; for Sellhausen: Byron C. Lichstein; case activity Issues (formulated by On Point): Whether a trial judge has a sua sponte duty to strike a prosepctive juror who is an in-law of the judge. Whether defense counsel’s use of a peremptory strike to remove the judge’s in-law renders harmless any error in the […]

State v. Joseph J. Spaeth, 2009AP2907-CR, review granted 2/8/11

on certification; for Spaeth: Shelley Fite, SPD, Madison Appellate; case activity Issue (formulated by On Point): Whether a statement made to law enforcement following a probationer’s honest accounting to his probation agent may derive from a “legitimate source wholly independent of compelled testimony” and therefore admissible in a criminal case, notwithstanding the promise of immunity for such statements when made to probation […]

On Point is sponsored by Wisconsin State Public Defenders. All content is subject to public disclosure. Comments are moderated. If you have questions about this blog, please email [email protected].

On Point provides information (not legal advice) about important developments in the law. Please note that this information may not be up to date. Viewing this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with the Wisconsin State Public Defender. Readers should consult an attorney for their legal needs.