Explore in-depth analysis
On Point is a judicial analysis blog written by members of the Wisconsin State Public Defenders. It includes cases from the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Supreme Court of Wisconsin, and the Supreme Court of the United States.
Important posts
Ahead in SCOW
Sign up
Consent — Authority — Driver’s Consent to Search Passenger’s Property
State v. Jennifer K. Matejka, 2001 WI 5, 621 N.W.2d 891, affirming unpublished decision of court of appeals. For Matejka: James B. Connell Issue: “(W)hether, under the consent exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement, a driver’s consent to a police officer’s search of a vehicle extends to a passenger’s jacket left in the vehicle at the […]
Consent – Coercion — Threat to Obtain Warrant
State v. Matthew J. Trecroci, Ryan J. Frayer, Ronnie J. Frayer, Scott E. Oberst, Amy L. Wicks, 2001 WI App 126 For defendants: Robert R. Henak Issue: Whether an apartment owner’s consent to search his apartment, given in response to police threat to obtain a search warrant even though no probable cause existed, was involuntary. Holding:: […]
Exigency — Automobile Exception to Warrant Requirement
State v. Bill Paul Marquardt , 2001 WI App 219, PFR filed 9/20/01 For Marquardt: James B. Connell Issue: Whether the automobile exception allowed the warrantless search of defendant’s car. Holding: A warrantless search of a vehicle requires two showings: probable cause; and “ready” mobility of vehicle. ¶¶31-32. Because the defendant did not contest probable cause until his […]
Exigency — Blood Alcohol
State v. Paul J. VanLaarhoven, 2001 WI App 275 For VanLaarhoven: Michele Anne Tjader Issue: Whether a blood sample, properly obtained under the Implied Consent law, may be analyzed without a warrant. Holding: The Implied Consent law requires that all who apply for a driver’s license consent not only to provide a sample, but also a chemical […]
Search & Seizure – Applicability of Exclusionary Rule – Violation of Nonconstitutional Right — Unauthorized Practice of Law
State v. Debra Noble, 2002 WI 64, reversing 2001 WI App 145, 246 Wis. 2d 533, 629 N.W.2d 31 For Noble: Thomas H. Boyd Issue/Holding: Suppression of evidence is required only where it has been obtained in violation of the defendant’s constitutional rights or of a statute specifically providing for suppression as a remedy. ¶14. Issue: Whether, assuming […]
Search & Seizure – Applicability of Exclusionary Rule — Violation of Nonconstitutional Right – Statutory Building Inspection Procedure
State v. Albert Jackowski, 2001 WI App 187 For Jackowski: Ronald C. Shiroka Issue: Whether violation of a statutory requirement for issuance of a building inspection warrant (namely, the § 66.0119(2) condition that such a warrant be issued only upon showing that consent to enter was refused) supports suppression of evidence obtained after entry under the warrant. Holding: […]
Administrative Searches — Warrants — Building Inspection
State v. Albert Jackowski, 2001 WI App 187 For Jackowski: Ronald C. Shiroka Issue1: Whether review of issuance of an administrative warrant is entitled to the same deference as a criminal search warrant. Holding: “Great deference” is no less accorded a magistrate’s decision to issue an administrative warrant than a criminal search warrant. ¶¶9-14. Issue2: Whether a building […]
§ 948.31, Interference with Child Custody/Abduction: Construction of Elements
State v. Stanley A. Samuel, 2001 WI App 25, 240 Wis. 2d 756, reversed, other grounds, 2002 WI 34 For Samuel: Robert R. Henak Issue: Whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain conviction for interference with child custody, § 948.31(2) and abduction, § 948.30(1)(a). Holding: ¶38 We adopt the State’s construction. So long as the defendant has had a hand […]
§ 961.41(2), Maintaining Drug Residence — Amendment of Information at Close of Case
State v. Davon R. Malcom, 2001 WI App 291, PFR filed 11/27/01 For Malcom: John D. Lubarsky, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue: Whether the trial court properly amended the information, after close of evidence, to add a charge of keeping a place “which is resorted to by persons using controlled substances” to the charge of using the […]
Guilty Pleas – Plea-Withdrawal, Postsentence — Newly Discovered Evidence
State v. Dennis R. Fosnow, 2001 WI App 2, 240 Wis. 2d 699, 624 N.W.2d 883 For Fosnow: David D. Cook Issue: Whether a postconviction diagnosis supporting an NGI defense amounted to newly discovered evidence, where the defendant had pled no contest after receiving unfavorable NGI evaluations. Holding: The new diagnosis was merely a new appreciation of […]
On Point is sponsored by Wisconsin State Public Defenders. All content is subject to public disclosure. Comments are moderated. If you have questions about this blog, please email [email protected].
On Point provides information (not legal advice) about important developments in the law. Please note that this information may not be up to date. Viewing this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with the Wisconsin State Public Defender. Readers should consult an attorney for their legal needs.