Explore in-depth analysis
On Point is a judicial analysis blog written by members of the Wisconsin State Public Defenders. It includes cases from the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Supreme Court of Wisconsin, and the Supreme Court of the United States.
Important posts
Ahead in SCOW
Sign up
Consecutive Sentences — No Authority to Impose, Relative to Jail Time as Condition of Probation in Another Case — Remedy of Resentencing
State v. Daron E. Maron, 214 Wis. 2d 384, 571 N.W.2d 454 (Ct. App. 1997) For Maron: Susan E. Alesia, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue/Holding1: … We conclude that § 973.15(2), Stats., does not give the trial court authority to order that the sentence be served consecutive to jail time already being served as a condition […]
Warrants – Scope – Physical Proximity Test
State v. Delano J. O’Brien, 223 Wis.2d 303, 588 N.W.2d 8 (1999), reconsideration denied, 225 Wis.2d 247, 591 N.W.2d 846 (1999), affirming State v. O’Brien, 214 Wis.2d 327, 572 N.W.2d 870 (Ct. App. 1997) For O’Brien: Martin E. Kohler, John C. Thomure, Jr. Holding: A search warrant was obtained for O’Brien’s residence (a farmstead including a duplex), and during the […]
Exigent Circumstances – Destruction of Evidence (Drugs) – Entry of Bedroom
State v. Scott Kiekhefer, 212 Wis. 2d 460, 569 N.W.2d 316 (Ct. App. 1997) For Kiekhefer: Linda Hornik Issue/Holding: The odor of burning marijuana from within a closed bedroom did not create exigent circumstances for the police, who did have permission to be in the house, to enter the bedroom: According to Londre, they believed Kiekhefer […]
§ 943.10, Burglary (Entry with Intent to Commit Felony) — Unanimity as to Intended Felony not Required
State v. Gordon Hammer, 216 Wis. 2d 214, 576 N.W.2d 285 (Ct. App 1997) For Hammer: Charles W. Jones, Jr. Issue: Whether juror unanimity is required for burglary, as to which felony was intended during the unlawful entry. Holding: In addressing Hammer’s unanimity claim, we engage in a two-step process. We must first determine whether […]
Arrest — Test for Custody — Temporary Stop Not Converted to Arrest by Moving Suspect
State v. Quartana, 213 Wis.2d 440, 570 N.W.2d 618 (Ct. App. 1997) For Quartana: Donal L. Connor II Issue/Holding: … Thus, when a person under investigation pursuant to a Terry stop is moved from one location to another, there exists a two-part inquiry. First, was the person moved within the “vicinity?” Second, was the purpose […]
Attenuation of Taint — In-Court Identification, Witness’s Independent Recollection
State v. David J. Roberson, 2006 WI 80, affirming 2005 WI App 195 For Roberson: Richard D. Martin, SPD, Madison Appellate Issue/Holding: ¶34 An in-court identification is admissible, therefore, if the court determines that the identification is based on an independent source. … In other words, the in-court identification must rest on an independent recollection of the […]
Attenuation of Taint — Statements
State v. Scott Kiekhefer, 212 Wis. 2d 460, 569 N.W.2d 316 (Ct. App. 1997) For Kiekhefer: Linda Hornik Issue/Holding1: Our inquiry does not end here, however. Because the agents’ entry constituted a violation of Kiekhefer’s Fourth Amendment protections, the question remains whether all of the seized evidence should be suppressed utilizing the attenuation doctrine articulated […]
Consent – Coercion — Threat to Obtain Warrant
State v. Scott Kiekhefer, 212 Wis. 2d 460, 569 N.W.2d 316 (Ct. App. 1997) For Kiekhefer: Linda Hornik Issue/Holding: “Police may not threaten to obtain a search warrant when there are no grounds for a valid warrant, but `[w]hen the expressed intention to obtain a warrant is genuine … and not merely a pretext to […]
Restitution — Limitations — Bail-Bond Disbursement
William Olson v. Kaprelian, 202 Wis. 2d 377, 550 N.W.2d 712 (Ct. App. 1996) For Olson: Terry W. Rose Issue: Whether bail posted under a bond in a seprate criminal case may be forfeited in order to satisfy a restitution obligation. Holding: In regards to this jurisdictional question, Olson … argues that a trial court has […]
Restitution — Defenses — Civil Settlement (Setoff)
William Olson v. Kaprelian, 202 Wis. 2d 377, 550 N.W.2d 712 (Ct. App. 1996) For Olson: Terry W. Rose Issue/Holding: The statutory section governing restitution allows a defendant to reduce civil damages awarded to the crime victim by amounts paid pursuant to a restitution order. See § 973.20(8), Stats. We read this statute to likewise […]
On Point is sponsored by Wisconsin State Public Defenders. All content is subject to public disclosure. Comments are moderated. If you have questions about this blog, please email [email protected].
On Point provides information (not legal advice) about important developments in the law. Please note that this information may not be up to date. Viewing this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with the Wisconsin State Public Defender. Readers should consult an attorney for their legal needs.