Explore in-depth analysis

On Point is a judicial analysis blog written by members of the Wisconsin State Public Defenders. It includes cases from the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Supreme Court of Wisconsin, and the Supreme Court of the United States.

Removal of Alien, 8 U.S.C. §1229b(a) – Parent’s Status not Imputed to Child

Holder v. Carlos Martinez Gutierrez, USSC No. 10-1542, 5/21/12, reversing 411 Fed. Appx. 121 and 399 Fed. Appx. 313 The Attorney General has discretion under 8 U.S.C. §1229b(a) to allow otherwise-removable aliens to remain in the U.S., if the alien satisfies three criteria: minimum of five years as a lawful permanent resident; continuous residence in the U.S. for at least seven […]

Defense win! Alzheimer’s diagnosis means person is not a “proper subject for treatment” under Chapter 51

Fond du Lac County v. Helen E. F., 2012 WI 50, affirming 2011 WI App 72; for Helen E.F.: Donald T. Lang, SPD, Madison Appellate; case activity Someone suffering from Alzheimer’s Disease is not a fit subject for commitment under ch. 51 but, instead, guardianship proceedings under ch. 55. ¶13  Wis. Stat. ch. 55 provides Helen with the best means […]

State v. Juan G. Gracia, 2011AP813-CR, petition for review granted 5/14/12

on review of unpublished court of appeals decision; for Gracia: Tracey A. Wood; case activity Warrantless Entry – Community Caretaker / OWI Enhancer – Collateral Attack  Issues (Composed by On Point):  Whether the community caretaker doctrine supported entry into Gracia’s bedroom after the police linked him to a serious traffic accident. Whether Gracia’s waiver of counsel in a prior […]

Service by Mail: Generally; Deadline, Administrative Proceeding: Computation

Karen Baker v. Department of Health Services, 2012 WI App 72 (recommended for publication); case activity Service, by Mail – Generally  ¶3 n. 2: … In the absence of a statutory provision, the rule in Wisconsin is that service of notice by mail is not effective until the party receives it.  Hotel Hay Corp. v. Milner Hotels, […]

Mootness Doctrine – Generally ; Probation – Conditions – No-Contact Order

State v. Matthew O. Roach, 2011AP2105-CR, District 4, 5/17/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Roach: Brandon Kuhl; case activity Mootness Doctrine – Generally  ¶8 n. 2: The State also contends that this issue is moot because the condition of probation Roach challenges expired on January 19, 2012.  An issue is moot when its resolution […]

Issue Preclusion

State v. Shannon J. Perronne, 2011AP1731-CR, District 2, 5/16/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Perrone: Casey J. Hoff; case activity When the principal State’s witness failed to appear at a suppression hearing, the trial court ordered suppression and dismissed the charge. The State then refiled the complaint and the trial court […]

Aaron B. v. County of Milwaukee, 2011AP2287-FT, District 1/2, 5/16/12

court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Aaron B.: Jeremy C. Perri, Hannah Blair Schieber, SPD, Milwaukee Appellate; case activity Guardianship – Placement Hearing – Personal Appearance  Failure to object to ward’s inability to appear at guardianship placement hearing waived argument that court should not have held hearing in ward’s absence. ¶7        Wisconsin Stat. § 55.10(2) provides that […]

OWI Enhancer – Collateral Attack – Prima Facie Showing

State v. Casey D. Schwandt, 2011AP2301-CR, District 2, 5/16/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Schwandt: Erik C. Johnson; case activity Schwandt made a prima facie showing that he did not validly waive counsel in a 1997 OWI conviction used as a penalty enhancer. General Principles. ¶5        A defendant may collaterally attack a prior […]

TPR – Summary Judgment on Grounds – Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

Michael B. v. Marcy M., 2011AP2846, District 2, 5/16/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Marcy M.: Jane S. Earle; case activity By responding (inadequately) to a TPR motion for summary judgment on grounds with a letter rather than evidence such as an affidavit, counsel provided ineffective assistance. ¶10      We disagree that counsel’s performance […]

Ineffective Assistance – Failure to Impeach

State v. Ralph S. Stewart, 2011AP1424-CR, District 1, 5/15/12 court of appeals decision (not recommended for publication); for Stewart: Byron C. Lichstein; case activity Counsel’s failure to impeach police officers, with their own reported statements, was deficient: ¶17      While matters of trial strategy are generally left to counsel’s professional judgment, counsel may be found ineffective if […]

On Point is sponsored by Wisconsin State Public Defenders. All content is subject to public disclosure. Comments are moderated. If you have questions about this blog, please email [email protected].

On Point provides information (not legal advice) about important developments in the law. Please note that this information may not be up to date. Viewing this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with the Wisconsin State Public Defender. Readers should consult an attorney for their legal needs.