Explore in-depth analysis
On Point is a judicial analysis blog written by members of the Wisconsin State Public Defenders. It includes cases from the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Supreme Court of Wisconsin, and the Supreme Court of the United States.
Important posts
Ahead in SCOW
Sign up
Appellate Review – “Waiver” and “Forfeiture,” Generally
Best Price Plumbing, Inc. v. Erie Insurance Exchange, 2012 WI 44; case activity ¶37 n. [11]: In State v. Ndina, 2009 WI 21, ¶29, 315 Wis. 2d 653, 761 N.W.2d 612, this court recognized that the terms “forfeiture” and “waiver” are often used interchangeably, but that the terms embody distinct legal concepts. Forfeiture is the failure to make the timely assertion of […]
IAC Claim – Evidence of Flight
State v. Herbert Ambrose Darden, 2011AP883-CR, District 4, 5/3/12 court of appeals decision (not recommended for publication); for Darden: Angela Conrad Kachelski; case activity Trial counsel correctly construed the holding of State v. Miller, 231 Wis. 2d 447, 460, 605 N.W.2d 567 (Ct. App. 1999): ¶16 This is not the first time that we have been asked to […]
Reasonable suspicion — traffic stop
County of Waukesha v. Thomas C. Groshek, 2011AP001371, District 2/4, 5/3/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Groshek: Thomas C. Simon; case activity ¶7 Deputy Smith was dispatched to a semi-rural area to investigate a report that a motorcycle had been involved in an accident at approximately 1:30 a.m., around “bar time,” in the vicinity […]
OWI, § 346.63(2)(a)1 – Operating on “Public” Roadway, Gated Community
State v. Michael F. Hyzy, 2011AP2503-CR, District 2, 5/2/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Hyzy: Jefren E. Olsen, SPD, Madison Appellate; case activity Evidence held sufficient to uphold OWI guilty verdict, against argument of failure of proof that roadways of gated community were “held out to the public for use of […]
TPR – Dispositional Hearing Evidence
Jessica L. G. v. Gilbert G. J., III, 2011AP3000, District 2, 5/2/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Gilbert G.J.: Brian C. Findley; case activity Jessica sought termination of Gilbert’s parental rights to their child. They divorced shortly after the child was born in 1997, and Gilbert had had contact with the […]
Judicial Disqualification – Material Witness
Memorandum Decision on Recusal in: Wisconsin Judicial Commission v. David T. Prosser, Jr., 2012 WI 43 (Justice Roggensack); case activity ¶1 On April 17, 2012, Justice David T. Prosser’s Attorney, Kevin P. Reak, wrote and asked me to disqualify myself from participation in the above-captioned matter, asserting that I am a material witness. … ¶2 … I […]
Reasonable Suspicion – Traffic Stop – “Fishtailing”
State v. John E. Meddaugh, 2011AP237-CR, District 1, 5/1/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge; not for publication); for Meddaugh: Theodore Perlick Molinari; case activity ¶9 Based on the totality of the circumstances, we agree with the circuit court that Sturino put forth specific, articulable facts which warranted the stop when considered with the inferences from those […]
Consent to Search – Scope – Trial Court Findings
State v. Timothy D. Moseley, 2011AP892-CR, District 1, 5/1/12 court of appeals decision (not recommended for publication); for Moseley: Michael J. Steinle; case activity Moseley’s contention, that he qualified his written consent to search with an oral limitation, was rejected by the trial court as a matter of credibility; that finding of fact is now […]
Effective assistance of counsel; Sexual assault of child ; Sentencing – discretion
State v. Thaying Lor, 2011AP2019-CR, District 1, 5/1/12 court of appeals decision (not recommended for publication); for Lor: Benjamin F. Gallagher; case activity Effective Assistance of Counsel Counsel did not provide ineffective representation in the following respects: Failure to timely file motion seeking admission of complainant’s prior untruthful allegation of sexual assault. However, Lor did […]
Stun Belt – “Standing Order”
State v. Allen K. Umentum, 2011AP2622-CR. District 3, 5/1/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Umentum: Roberta A. Heckes; case activity Under a local, Brown County “standing order,” all in-custody defendants appearing at jury trial were required, without particularized demonstration of need, to wear a non-visible stun belt. The courthouse had no screening checkpoints, […]
On Point is sponsored by Wisconsin State Public Defenders. All content is subject to public disclosure. Comments are moderated. If you have questions about this blog, please email [email protected].
On Point provides information (not legal advice) about important developments in the law. Please note that this information may not be up to date. Viewing this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with the Wisconsin State Public Defender. Readers should consult an attorney for their legal needs.