Explore in-depth analysis

On Point is a judicial analysis blog written by members of the Wisconsin State Public Defenders. It includes cases from the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Supreme Court of Wisconsin, and the Supreme Court of the United States.

Mental Commitment – Finding of Dangerousness

Trempealeau County v. Charles O., 2011AP2794, District 3, 5/1/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Charles O.: William E. Schmaal, SPD, Madison Appellate; case activity The court rejects Charles O.’s argument that the evidence fell short of the “fifth-standard” showing of dangerousness, § 51.20(1)(a)2.e., State v. Dennis H., 2002 WI 104, ¶14, 255 Wis. […]

TPR – Best Interests Determination

State v. Elizabeth M., 2012AP454, District 1, 5/1/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Elizabeth M.: Jeffrey W. Jensen; case activity The court rejects Elizabeth M.’s argument that the trial court erroneously exercised discretion in favor of terminating of parental rights: ¶30      Basically, Elizabeth M. argues for a second chance.  She testified that she now […]

State v. Leilani E. Neumann, 2011AP1105-CR / State v. Dale R. Neumann, 2011AP1044-CR, District 3, 5/1/12

court of appeals certification, review granted, 6/13/12; for Leilani Neumann: Byron C. Lichstein; case activity; for Dale Neumann: Stephen L. Miller; case activity Reckless Homicide and “Faith Healing” as Substitute for Medical Treatment Convicted of reckless homicide, § 940.06(1), in the death of their daughter for failing to obtain medical treatment, the Neumanns raise various issues relating to […]

Roselva Chaidez v. United States, USSC No. 11-820, cert granted 4/30/12

Question Presented (from cert petition):  In Padilla v. Kentucky, 130 S. Ct. 1473 (2010), this Court held that criminal defendants receive ineffective assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment when their attorneys fail to advise them that pleading guilty to an offense will subject them to deportation. The question presented is whether Padilla applies to […]

SVP Commitment – Jury Instructions: “Mental Disorder”

State v. Jonathan Phillips, 2010AP1490, District 4, 4/26/12 court of appeals decision (not recommended for publication); for Phillips: Steven D. Grunder, SPD, Madison Appellate; case activity; originally recommended for publication, changed per order 5/1/12 Although admittedly “inconsistent” in the way it defines “mental disorder,” when read “as a whole,” the pattern jury instruction for ch. 980 […]

State v. Courtney C. Beamon, 2011 WI App 131, rev. granted 4/25/12

court of appeals decision; for Beamon: Donna L. Hintze, SPD, Madison Appellate; case activity; prior post Elements, Fleeing, § 346.04(3) – Instructions – Sufficiency of Proof – Harmless Error  Issues (from Beamon’s Petition for Review): Is a jury instruction which describes the factual theory alleged to satisfy an element legally erroneous? In a criminal case, are the instructions […]

Court of Appeals Publication Orders, 4/12

court of appeals publication orders, 4/25/12 On Point posts from this list: 2012 WI App 42 La Crosse Tribune v. Circuit Court for La Crosse County 2012 WI App 46 State v. Lamont L. Travis 2012 WI App 47 State v. Matthew R. Steffes 2012 WI App 48 State v. Dennis R. Thiel 2012 WI App 49 Village of McFarland v. […]

The Plotkin Analysis: judicial substitution in criminal cases; right to refuse probation; access to juvenile records; hearsay at preliminary hearings

I will periodically include a brief description of pending legislation that affects the State Public Defender’s practice.  With the Legislature’s regular session having ended on March 16, I wanted to summarize a couple of bills that either passed in the closing days of session, or bills that failed to pass. One bill failing to pass […]

Habeas – Procedural Bar: Waiver by State

Patrick Wood v. Milyard, USSC No. 10-9995, 4/24/12, reversing 403 Fed. Appx. 335 (10th Cir 2010) This case concerns the authority of a federal court to raise, on its own motion, a statute of limitations defense to a habeas corpus petition. After state prisoner Patrick Wood filed a federal habeas corpus petition, the State twice informed […]

Intentionally Mistreating / Shooting Animal, Resulting in Death, §§ 951.02 951.09 and 951.18(1): Intent not Element – Pellet Gun Is Weapon

State v. Shawn M. Klingelhoets, 2012 WI App 55 (recommended for publication); for Klingelhoets: Robert R. Henak; case activity Intentionally Mistreating Animal, Resulting in Death, §§ 951.02 and 951.18(1) – Intent Element  Intentionally mistreating an animal, resulting in the animal’s death, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 951.02 and 951.18(1), doesn’t require intent to kill: ¶17      In sum, the plain language of Wis. […]

On Point is sponsored by Wisconsin State Public Defenders. All content is subject to public disclosure. Comments are moderated. If you have questions about this blog, please email [email protected].

On Point provides information (not legal advice) about important developments in the law. Please note that this information may not be up to date. Viewing this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with the Wisconsin State Public Defender. Readers should consult an attorney for their legal needs.