Explore in-depth analysis
On Point is a judicial analysis blog written by members of the Wisconsin State Public Defenders. It includes cases from the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Supreme Court of Wisconsin, and the Supreme Court of the United States.
Important posts
Ahead in SCOW
Sign up
Shiffra-Green Procedure – Privileged Records – Remedy
State v. Samuel Curtis Johnson, III, 2011AP2864-CRAC, District 2, 4/18/12, WSC rev granted 11/14/12 court of appeals decision (not recommended for publication), supreme court review granted 11/14/12; for Johnson: Mark D. Richards, Michael F. Hart, Craig S. Powell, Geoffrey R. Misfeldt; case activity Shiffra-Green Procedure – Privileged Records – Remedy Where Witness Declines Consent for in Camera […]
Carrying Concealed Weapon, § 941.23 (2009-10) – Facially Constitutional; Constitutional, as Applied; Defense of Coercion, § 939.46(1)
State v. Clarence E. Brown, 2011AP2049-CR, District 1, 4/17/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Brown: Daniel R. Drigot; case activity Carrying Concealed Weapon, § 941.23 (2009-10) – Facially Constitutional The court upholds the constitutionality of the prior version of § 941.23, CCW, as not violating the right to bear arms (since-modified, to allow conceal-carry […]
Felon-in-Possession, § 941.29: Constitutionality, Second Amendment
State v. Thomas M. Pocian, 2012 WI App 58 (recommended for publication); for Pocian: Martin E. Kohler, Craig S. Powell, Geoffrey R. Misfeldt; case activity ¶2 In 1986, Thomas M. Pocian was convicted of writing forged checks, a felony. Twenty-four years later, Pocian was prosecuted under Wis. Stat. § 941.29, which prohibits a felon from possessing a firearm. Relying on Heller and McDonald, Pocian […]
Traffic Stop – 911 Call
State v. Michael L. Frank, 2011AP2306, District 3, 4/10/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Frank: Robert A. Kennedy, Jr.; case activity Information, provided by a 911 caller reporting observations about Frank’s erratic driving, provided a basis for a lawful stop. 17 In this case, we conclude that Judge lawfully stopped Frank based on Shatzer’s […]
§ 974.06 Motion – Custody Requirement; OWI – Enhancer
State v. David D. Austin, 2011AP1042, District 1, 4/10/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); pro se; case activity Because Austin was no longer in custody under the conviction he sought to collaterally attack pursuant to § 974.06, the court lacked jurisdiction to entertain his motion. It is not enough that he was in […]
Double Jeopardy – Mistrial over Objection – “Manifest Necessity”
State v. Levi Alexander Rodebaugh, 2011AP2659-CR, District 4, 4/5/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Rodebaugh: Bryon J. Walker; case activity Grant of mistrial was unsupported by “manifest necessity,” hence was an erroneous exercise of discretion, where the complainant failed to show for trial and couldn’t be quickly located. Retrial is therefore barred as […]
Adrian Moncrieffe v. Holder, USSC No. 11-702, cert granted 4/2/12
Question Presented (from Supreme Court docket): The Immigration and Nationality Act provides that an alien “who is convicted of an aggravated felony at any time after admission is deportable.” 8 U.S.C. §1227(a)(2)(A)(iii). A state law offense may constitute an “aggravated felony” if it is the equivalent of a “felony punishable under the Controlled Substances Act.” […]
Payton v. New York Violation (Unlawful Entry of Residence, but with Probable Cause) and New York v. Harris Attenuation Doctrine
State v. Devin W. Felix, 2012 WI 36, reversing unpublished decision; for Felix: Leonard D. Kachinsky; case activity Under Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573 (1980), warrantless arrest following nonconsensual entry of a home is illegal unless supported by probable cause and exigent circumstances. However, New York v. Harris, 495 U.S. 14 (1990) deems non-suppressible as a matter […]
Strip Search – Detainee – Jail Policy
Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of County of Burlington et al., USSC No. 10-945, 4/2/12, affirming 621 F.3d 296 (3rd Cir. 2010) A jail policy requiring that every detainee who will be admitted to the facility’s general population may be required to undergo close visual inspection while undressed is reasonable under the fourth amendment. The question […]
Federal Sentencing Authority – Consecutive to State Sentence not Yet Imposed
Monroe Ace Setser v. U.S., USSC No. 10-7387, 3/28/12, affirming 607 F.3d 128 (5th Cir 2010) District courts have authority to make a sentence for a federal offense consecutive to an anticipated, but not-yet imposed state sentence. Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, 18 U. S. C. §3584, construed. It is fundamental that we construe statutes governing […]
On Point is sponsored by Wisconsin State Public Defenders. All content is subject to public disclosure. Comments are moderated. If you have questions about this blog, please email [email protected].
On Point provides information (not legal advice) about important developments in the law. Please note that this information may not be up to date. Viewing this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with the Wisconsin State Public Defender. Readers should consult an attorney for their legal needs.