Explore in-depth analysis
On Point is a judicial analysis blog written by members of the Wisconsin State Public Defenders. It includes cases from the Wisconsin Court of Appeals, Supreme Court of Wisconsin, and the Supreme Court of the United States.
Important posts
Ahead in SCOW
Sign up
Traffic Stop – Duration
State v. Daniel M. Buesgens, No. 2011AP2241-CR, District 3, 3/27/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Buesgens: Eric John Nelson; case activity Buesgens, told he was “absolutely free to go” after a concededly proper traffic stop, wasn’t then “reseized” when the officer asked questions related to whether he had been drinking. ¶15 Similar to Williams, […]
TPR – Default; TPR – Right to Present Evidence
State v. Laura M., 2011AP2828, District 1, 3/27/12 court of appeals decision(1-judge, not for publication); for Laura M.: Russell D. Bohach; case activity The trial court properly exercised discretion in finding Laura M. in default when she failed to appear for trial on TPR grounds. A father of one of her children, Padrein K., called counsel to report […]
Florida v. Clayton Harris, USSC No. 11-817, cert granted 3/26/12
Question Presented (from Cert Petition): Whether the Florida Supreme Court has decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts with the established Fourth Amendment precedent of this Court by holding that an alert by a well-trained narcotics detection dog certified to detect illegal contraband is insufficient to establish probable cause for the search […]
Sentencing Discretion
State v. Scott P. Wojcik, 2011AP2568-CR, District 2, 3/21/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Wojcik: Christopher Lee Wiesmueller; case activity 90-day jail sentence for OWI-2nd (minimum 0f 5 days, maximum of 6 months) upheld as proper exercise of discretion. Trial court considered as aggravators recentness of prior OWI conviction (2008) and his seeming level […]
OWI – Repeater – Collateral Attack
State v. Traci L. Scott, 2011AP2115-CR, District 2, 3/21/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Scott: Rex Anderegg; case activity The court rejects Scott’s challenge to a prior OWI conviction, concluding that she aware of the range of punishments, dangers of self-representation, etc. General test recited: ¶2 A defendant facing an enhanced sentence […]
Counsel – Effective Assistance – Plea Bargaining – Prejudice: After Trial
Lafler v. Anthony Cooper, USSC No. 10-209, 3/21/12, vacating and remanding, 376 Fed. Appx. 563 (6th Cir. 2010); prior post; companion case: Missouri v. Frye, 10-444 Cooper turned down a favorable plea bargain and instead went to trial, after his attorney erroneously told him the prosecution would be unable to establish intent to kill because […]
Missouri v. Galin E. Frye, USSC No. 10-444, 3/21/12
United States Supreme Court decision, vacating and remanding, 311 S.W.2d 350 (Mo. App. W.D. 2010); prior post; companion case: Lafler v. Cooper, 10-209 Counsel – Effective Assistance – Plea Bargaining Counsel’s failure to communicate to Frye a favorable plea bargain offer from the prosecutor was deficient performance under 6th amendment analysis of effective assistance of counsel. Frye’s […]
Habeas – Procedural Default – IAC Claim “Initial-Review” Collateral Proceeding
Luis Mariano Martinez v. Ryan, USSC No. 10-1001, 3/20/12, reversing and remanding, 623 F.3d 731 (9th Cir. 2011) Where, under state law, claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel must be raised in an initial-review collateral proceeding, a procedural default will not bar a federal habeas court from hearing a substantial claim of ineffective assistance […]
OWI – Operating in Parking Lot: “Held Out to the Public for Use,” § 346.61
State v. Heidi L. Fleischmann, 2011AP2558-CR, District 3, 3/20/12 court of appeals decision (1-judge, not for publication); for Fleischmann: Sarvan Singh; case activity The State satisfied its burden of proving that Fleischmann operation of a motor vehicle, in a parking lot adjacent to an empty business building, was on “premises held out to the public […]
State v. James G. Brereton, 2011 WI App 127, rev. granted 3/15/12
court of appeals decision; for Brereton: Matthew S. Pinix; case activity; prior post Search & Seizure – GPS Device – Warrant Issues (Composed by On Point): Whether the police illegally seized Brereton’s car, so as to taint a subsequently issued warrant for installation of a GPS tracking device on it; or, whether tracking was unreasonable under U.S. v. Jones, __ U.S. […]
On Point is sponsored by Wisconsin State Public Defenders. All content is subject to public disclosure. Comments are moderated. If you have questions about this blog, please email [email protected].
On Point provides information (not legal advice) about important developments in the law. Please note that this information may not be up to date. Viewing this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with the Wisconsin State Public Defender. Readers should consult an attorney for their legal needs.